Psychological distance and fear of crime: Towards a new understanding of risk perception formation

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Jacques Mellberg, Michael L. Chataway, M. Ball, Toby Miles-Johnson
{"title":"Psychological distance and fear of crime: Towards a new understanding of risk perception formation","authors":"Jacques Mellberg, Michael L. Chataway, M. Ball, Toby Miles-Johnson","doi":"10.1177/26338076221105899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study seeks to enhance the theoretical development of fear of crime by exploring the complex cognitive processes involved in risk perception formation. We apply Trope and Liberman’s construal level theory (CLT) of psychological distance to understand how and why these complex cognitive processes might shape an individual’s worry about crime. We pilot survey measures designed to capture perceptions of psychological distance and worry about crime using a convenience sample of N = 265 residents from Townsville, Queensland, Australia. Results of confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) reveal that these new measures have good scaling properties and that each dimension of psychological distance is empirically distinct. Multiple linear regression demonstrates that temporal, social and hypothetical psychological distance predicted worry at a statistically significant level, however, spatial distance was in the expected direction but was not statistically significant. These findings suggest that CLT is an appropriate lens to understand how individuals perceive their risk of criminal victimisation, but further research is needed to refine spatial distance survey measures. We recommend future research explores how psychological distance may interact with other well-known correlates of worry, such as age, gender and ethnicity.","PeriodicalId":29902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminology","volume":"55 1","pages":"377 - 399"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26338076221105899","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study seeks to enhance the theoretical development of fear of crime by exploring the complex cognitive processes involved in risk perception formation. We apply Trope and Liberman’s construal level theory (CLT) of psychological distance to understand how and why these complex cognitive processes might shape an individual’s worry about crime. We pilot survey measures designed to capture perceptions of psychological distance and worry about crime using a convenience sample of N = 265 residents from Townsville, Queensland, Australia. Results of confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) reveal that these new measures have good scaling properties and that each dimension of psychological distance is empirically distinct. Multiple linear regression demonstrates that temporal, social and hypothetical psychological distance predicted worry at a statistically significant level, however, spatial distance was in the expected direction but was not statistically significant. These findings suggest that CLT is an appropriate lens to understand how individuals perceive their risk of criminal victimisation, but further research is needed to refine spatial distance survey measures. We recommend future research explores how psychological distance may interact with other well-known correlates of worry, such as age, gender and ethnicity.
心理距离与犯罪恐惧:对风险认知形成的新认识
目前的研究试图通过探索风险感知形成中涉及的复杂认知过程来促进犯罪恐惧的理论发展。我们应用Trope和Liberman的心理距离解释水平理论(CLT)来理解这些复杂的认知过程如何以及为什么会影响个人对犯罪的担忧。我们试点调查措施,旨在捕捉对心理距离的感知和对犯罪的担忧,使用便利样本N = 265名来自澳大利亚昆士兰州汤斯维尔的居民。验证性因素分析(CFA)的结果表明,这些新的测量方法具有良好的标度特性,并且心理距离的各个维度在经验上是不同的。多元线性回归表明,时间、社会和假设的心理距离在统计学上显著预测了担忧,然而,空间距离在预期方向上,但在统计学上不显著。这些发现表明,CLT是了解个人如何感知其刑事受害风险的合适视角,但还需要进一步研究来完善空间距离调查措施。我们建议未来的研究探索心理距离如何与其他众所周知的担忧相关因素相互作用,如年龄、性别和种族。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Criminology
Journal of Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信