Atypical Legal Systems — “Mixed” or “Hybrid”

Ion Postu, Veronica Rusnac
{"title":"Atypical Legal Systems — “Mixed” or “Hybrid”","authors":"Ion Postu, Veronica Rusnac","doi":"10.54481/sju.2022.2.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the atypical legal systems, which present features from different types of law. The authors state the classical division into legal families is outdated and many legal systems present amalgamated elements. According to the authors’ opinion, based on the typological approach, some legal systems can simultaneously be part of different legal families, being at the intersection between them. Thus, some elements of the legal system present characteristics of one type of law, and others — of another type of law, their specific mix representing a mixed system. As an outcome, the authors conclude that there is no univocal approach to understanding the concept of “mixed system”, and propose to understand the mixed legal system as “a legal system in which a fundamental branch or a main element presents features characteristic of a different type of law than the dominant one in other elements of the system”.","PeriodicalId":52793,"journal":{"name":"Studii Juridice Universitare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studii Juridice Universitare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54481/sju.2022.2.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes the atypical legal systems, which present features from different types of law. The authors state the classical division into legal families is outdated and many legal systems present amalgamated elements. According to the authors’ opinion, based on the typological approach, some legal systems can simultaneously be part of different legal families, being at the intersection between them. Thus, some elements of the legal system present characteristics of one type of law, and others — of another type of law, their specific mix representing a mixed system. As an outcome, the authors conclude that there is no univocal approach to understanding the concept of “mixed system”, and propose to understand the mixed legal system as “a legal system in which a fundamental branch or a main element presents features characteristic of a different type of law than the dominant one in other elements of the system”.
非典型法律制度-“混合型”或“混合型”
本文分析了非典型法律制度,从不同类型的法律中呈现出不同的特点。作者指出,传统的法律家族划分已经过时,许多法律体系都存在合并的因素。根据作者的意见,根据类型学方法,一些法律体系可以同时成为不同法律家族的一部分,处于它们之间的交叉点。因此,法律体系的一些要素呈现出一种法律类型的特征,而另一些要素则呈现出另一种法律的特征,它们的特定组合代表着一个混合体系。因此,作者得出结论,理解“混合制度”的概念没有统一的方法,并建议将混合法律制度理解为“一种法律体系,其中一个基本分支或主要要素呈现出不同于该体系其他要素中占主导地位的法律类型的特征”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信