Pedagogical and decolonial affordances of group portfolio assessments for learning in South African universities

Q3 Social Sciences
I. Fouché, L. Dison, Grant Andrews, Maria Prozesky
{"title":"Pedagogical and decolonial affordances of group portfolio assessments for learning in South African universities","authors":"I. Fouché, L. Dison, Grant Andrews, Maria Prozesky","doi":"10.14426/cristal.v9isi.325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our paper discusses our recent experiences with designing effective assessments for challenging local contexts by using group work portfolio projects. South African universities are experiencing ever-increasing student numbers, diverse student bodies which have different language and literacy skill levels, and limited resources. Simultaneously, the need to decolonise university curricula and teaching and learning practices is being actively investigated across South Africa. In this paper, we discuss preliminary steps we have taken towards achieving this broader transformative agenda in the context of the massification of education, namely designing effective and decolonial assessments that support epistemological access and academic success, while at the same time challenging what counts as ‘powerful knowledge’ (Young and Muller, 2013) in the classroom. We argue that effective decolonial knowledge practices and deep critical engagement can be achieved by using group work portfolio tasks that align with assessment for learning principles (Carless, 2015). Using a design- based research approach, we describe three courses across two universities which have implemented portfolio-type group assessments. The preliminary findings suggest that group projects can yield rich and productive assessment for learning outcomes in large classes. In addition, portfolio projects that purposely interrogate diverse perspectives, knowledges and experiences can harness the diversity of groups to work towards decolonising the classroom.","PeriodicalId":36957,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14426/cristal.v9isi.325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Our paper discusses our recent experiences with designing effective assessments for challenging local contexts by using group work portfolio projects. South African universities are experiencing ever-increasing student numbers, diverse student bodies which have different language and literacy skill levels, and limited resources. Simultaneously, the need to decolonise university curricula and teaching and learning practices is being actively investigated across South Africa. In this paper, we discuss preliminary steps we have taken towards achieving this broader transformative agenda in the context of the massification of education, namely designing effective and decolonial assessments that support epistemological access and academic success, while at the same time challenging what counts as ‘powerful knowledge’ (Young and Muller, 2013) in the classroom. We argue that effective decolonial knowledge practices and deep critical engagement can be achieved by using group work portfolio tasks that align with assessment for learning principles (Carless, 2015). Using a design- based research approach, we describe three courses across two universities which have implemented portfolio-type group assessments. The preliminary findings suggest that group projects can yield rich and productive assessment for learning outcomes in large classes. In addition, portfolio projects that purposely interrogate diverse perspectives, knowledges and experiences can harness the diversity of groups to work towards decolonising the classroom.
南非大学集体学习档案袋评估的教育学和非殖民化可供性
我们的论文讨论了我们最近通过使用小组工作组合项目为具有挑战性的当地环境设计有效评估的经验。南非大学的学生人数不断增加,学生群体多样化,语言和识字技能水平不同,资源有限。与此同时,南非各地正在积极调查大学课程和教学实践非殖民化的必要性。在本文中,我们讨论了在教育大众化的背景下,我们为实现这一更广泛的变革议程所采取的初步步骤,即设计有效的非殖民化评估,支持认识论的获取和学术成功,同时在课堂上挑战什么是“强大的知识”(Young和Muller,2013)。我们认为,通过使用与学习原则评估相一致的小组工作组合任务,可以实现有效的非殖民化知识实践和深入的批判性参与(Carless,2015)。使用基于设计的研究方法,我们描述了两所大学的三门课程,这三所大学已经实施了档案袋类型的小组评估。初步研究结果表明,小组项目可以对大班的学习结果进行丰富而富有成效的评估。此外,有意询问不同观点、知识和经验的组合项目可以利用群体的多样性,努力实现课堂的非殖民化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning
Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书