The role of the information environment during the first COVID-19 wave in Germany

IF 1.8 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Sebastian Stier, Bernd Weiss, Timo Hartmann, Fabian Flöck, Johannes Breuer, Ines Schaurer, Mirjan Kummerow
{"title":"The role of the information environment during the first COVID-19 wave in Germany","authors":"Sebastian Stier, Bernd Weiss, Timo Hartmann, Fabian Flöck, Johannes Breuer, Ines Schaurer, Mirjan Kummerow","doi":"10.1080/2474736X.2022.2135451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic has been accompanied by intense debates about the role of the information environment. On the one hand, citizens learn from public information campaigns and news coverage and supposedly adjust their behaviours accordingly; on the other, there are fears of widespread misinformation and its detrimental effects. Analyzing the posts of the most important German information providers published via Facebook, this paper first identifies a uniform salience of subtopics related to COVID-19 across different types of information sources that generally emphasized the threats to public health. Next, using a large survey conducted with German residents during the first COVID-19 wave in March 2020 we investigate how information exposure relates to perceptions, attitudes and behaviours concerning the pandemic. Regression analyses show that getting COVID-19-related information from a multitude of sources has a statistically significant and positive relationship with public health outcomes. These findings are consistent even across the ideological left/right spectrum and party preferences. These consistent correlational results demonstrate that during the first wave of COVID-19, a uniform information environment went hand in hand with a cautious public and widely accepted mitigation measures. Nonetheless, we discuss these findings against the backdrop of an increased politicization of public-health measures during later COVID-19 waves.","PeriodicalId":20269,"journal":{"name":"Political Research Exchange","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Research Exchange","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2022.2135451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic has been accompanied by intense debates about the role of the information environment. On the one hand, citizens learn from public information campaigns and news coverage and supposedly adjust their behaviours accordingly; on the other, there are fears of widespread misinformation and its detrimental effects. Analyzing the posts of the most important German information providers published via Facebook, this paper first identifies a uniform salience of subtopics related to COVID-19 across different types of information sources that generally emphasized the threats to public health. Next, using a large survey conducted with German residents during the first COVID-19 wave in March 2020 we investigate how information exposure relates to perceptions, attitudes and behaviours concerning the pandemic. Regression analyses show that getting COVID-19-related information from a multitude of sources has a statistically significant and positive relationship with public health outcomes. These findings are consistent even across the ideological left/right spectrum and party preferences. These consistent correlational results demonstrate that during the first wave of COVID-19, a uniform information environment went hand in hand with a cautious public and widely accepted mitigation measures. Nonetheless, we discuss these findings against the backdrop of an increased politicization of public-health measures during later COVID-19 waves.
信息环境在德国第一次COVID-19浪潮中的作用
COVID-19大流行引发了关于信息环境作用的激烈辩论。一方面,公民从公共信息活动和新闻报道中学习,并相应地调整自己的行为;另一方面,人们担心广泛传播的错误信息及其有害影响。本文分析了德国最重要的信息提供商在Facebook上发布的帖子,首先确定了与COVID-19相关的子主题在不同类型的信息来源中的一致性显著性,这些信息来源通常强调对公共卫生的威胁。接下来,通过在2020年3月第一次COVID-19浪潮期间对德国居民进行的一项大型调查,我们调查了信息暴露与对大流行的看法、态度和行为之间的关系。回归分析表明,从多种来源获取与covid -19相关的信息与公共卫生结果具有统计显着的正相关关系。这些发现甚至在意识形态的左/右光谱和党派偏好中都是一致的。这些一致的相关结果表明,在第一波COVID-19期间,统一的信息环境与谨慎的公众和广泛接受的缓解措施相辅相成。尽管如此,我们在随后的COVID-19浪潮中公共卫生措施日益政治化的背景下讨论这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Political Research Exchange
Political Research Exchange POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信