Charge dissociation in organic solar cells—from Onsager and Frenkel to modern models

IF 6.1 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Dan Liraz, N. Tessler
{"title":"Charge dissociation in organic solar cells—from Onsager and Frenkel to modern models","authors":"Dan Liraz, N. Tessler","doi":"10.1063/5.0099986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organic-based solar cells have developed for the last three decades. Moving forward generally requires the assistance of useful models that are adapted to currently used materials and device architectures. The least understood part of the charge generation is the first step of the exciton dissociation, and new or refined models are being suggested. However, many of today's questions have been asked before, going back almost an entire century. We have gone to the 1930s and attempted to critically review significant contributions on equal footing. We find that Onsager's and Frenkel's models have a similar foundation but were developed to suit very different materials (ions in solutions vs electrons in semiconductors). The contribution by Braun or the Onsager–Braun model can be considered wrong, yet it was instrumental for the field's development. The community practically ignores one of the most promising models (Arkhipov–Baranovskii). Hot exciton dissociation has many faces due to “hot” being a relative term and/or the heat being stored in different ways (electronic, vibronic, etc.). Entropy considerations are instrumental in simplifying the picture, yet they add no physics compared to the full-3D models. We hope that by emphasizing the physical picture of the various models and the underlying assumptions, one could use them as a stepping stone to the next generation models.","PeriodicalId":72559,"journal":{"name":"Chemical physics reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical physics reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0099986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Organic-based solar cells have developed for the last three decades. Moving forward generally requires the assistance of useful models that are adapted to currently used materials and device architectures. The least understood part of the charge generation is the first step of the exciton dissociation, and new or refined models are being suggested. However, many of today's questions have been asked before, going back almost an entire century. We have gone to the 1930s and attempted to critically review significant contributions on equal footing. We find that Onsager's and Frenkel's models have a similar foundation but were developed to suit very different materials (ions in solutions vs electrons in semiconductors). The contribution by Braun or the Onsager–Braun model can be considered wrong, yet it was instrumental for the field's development. The community practically ignores one of the most promising models (Arkhipov–Baranovskii). Hot exciton dissociation has many faces due to “hot” being a relative term and/or the heat being stored in different ways (electronic, vibronic, etc.). Entropy considerations are instrumental in simplifying the picture, yet they add no physics compared to the full-3D models. We hope that by emphasizing the physical picture of the various models and the underlying assumptions, one could use them as a stepping stone to the next generation models.
有机太阳能电池中的电荷解离——从Onsager和Frenkel到现代模型
有机太阳能电池已经发展了三十年。向前发展通常需要适用于当前使用的材料和设备架构的有用模型的帮助。电荷产生中最不为人所知的部分是激子离解的第一步,人们提出了新的或改进的模型。然而,今天的许多问题在几乎整整一个世纪前就已经被问过了。我们回到了20世纪30年代,试图在平等的基础上批判性地审查重大贡献。我们发现,Onsager和Frenkel的模型有着相似的基础,但它们是为适应非常不同的材料(溶液中的离子与半导体中的电子)而开发的。Braun或Onsager–Braun模型的贡献可能被认为是错误的,但它对该领域的发展起到了重要作用。社区实际上忽略了最有前景的模型之一(Arkhipov–Baranovskii)。热激子离解有很多方面,因为“热”是一个相对术语和/或热量以不同的方式(电子、振动等)储存。熵的考虑有助于简化图片,但与全3D模型相比,它们没有增加物理性质。我们希望,通过强调各种模型的物理画面和基本假设,人们可以将其作为下一代模型的垫脚石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信