A review of scales of perceived parenting style

IF 0.6 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Sukanya Rajan, J. Navaneetham, P. Marriamma, D. Muralidhar
{"title":"A review of scales of perceived parenting style","authors":"Sukanya Rajan, J. Navaneetham, P. Marriamma, D. Muralidhar","doi":"10.4103/jmhhb.jmhhb_34_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Research in the field of parenting has grown in the recent decade. Parenting style scales are used to measure the perception of parenting style either from the child's viewpoint or parent's viewpoint. The previous review of scales affirms the parenting style scales in the western context. The current review examines the scales available to measure the same from a young adult's perspective and throws light on the need to have a scale which can bring out cultural aspect. Methodology: Searches of PubMed, EBSCO, PROQUEST, and Google Scholar to identify scales that focus on the perception of parenting styles and find publications that assess their criterion-related validity. Results: Almost 10 numbers of instruments assessing parenting style among the young adults were located. Searches identified 10 scales and the publication that assesses the validity. The evident approach to item generation was available literature, focus group discussion, and interviews prominently on the foundation of Baumarind's theory of parenting style. Findings raise methodological concerns, which inform recommendation for future development. Conclusion: Scales perceiving parenting styles have been developed in the western context and validated for Indian context, hence there is a need for developing indigenous scales suiting our collectivistic culture.","PeriodicalId":31679,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health and Human Behaviour","volume":"24 1","pages":"73 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health and Human Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmhhb.jmhhb_34_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Research in the field of parenting has grown in the recent decade. Parenting style scales are used to measure the perception of parenting style either from the child's viewpoint or parent's viewpoint. The previous review of scales affirms the parenting style scales in the western context. The current review examines the scales available to measure the same from a young adult's perspective and throws light on the need to have a scale which can bring out cultural aspect. Methodology: Searches of PubMed, EBSCO, PROQUEST, and Google Scholar to identify scales that focus on the perception of parenting styles and find publications that assess their criterion-related validity. Results: Almost 10 numbers of instruments assessing parenting style among the young adults were located. Searches identified 10 scales and the publication that assesses the validity. The evident approach to item generation was available literature, focus group discussion, and interviews prominently on the foundation of Baumarind's theory of parenting style. Findings raise methodological concerns, which inform recommendation for future development. Conclusion: Scales perceiving parenting styles have been developed in the western context and validated for Indian context, hence there is a need for developing indigenous scales suiting our collectivistic culture.
感知育儿方式量表综述
背景:近十年来,育儿领域的研究有所增长。育儿风格量表用于从孩子或父母的角度衡量对育儿风格的感知。先前对量表的回顾肯定了西方背景下的养育方式量表。目前的综述从年轻人的角度考察了可用于衡量这一点的量表,并阐明了有必要制定一个能够体现文化方面的量表。方法:搜索PubMed、EBSCO、PROQUEST和Google Scholar,以确定关注育儿方式感知的量表,并找到评估其标准相关有效性的出版物。结果:找到了近10种评估年轻人育儿方式的工具。检索确定了10个量表和评估有效性的出版物。项目生成的明显方法是在Baumarind育儿风格理论的基础上进行的文献、焦点小组讨论和访谈。调查结果提出了方法上的关切,为今后的发展建议提供了依据。结论:感知养育方式的量表是在西方背景下开发的,并在印度背景下得到了验证,因此有必要开发适合我们集体主义文化的本土量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信