Numerical Simulation Study of Steam Injection Optimization in Shallow Reservoir

I. Budi, Ajeng Oktaviani
{"title":"Numerical Simulation Study of Steam Injection Optimization in Shallow Reservoir","authors":"I. Budi, Ajeng Oktaviani","doi":"10.25299/jeee.2023.14099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an EOR project, process improvement must be continually pursued since EOR is often marginally profitable. In steamflood EOR project, steam injection rate is very important parameter to ensure that each pattern reach maturity within a certain early period that result in high oil recovery and meet the economic hurdles. In particularly shallow formation settings, steam injection target is often difficult to achieve because limited by fracturing pressure to avoid breaching the cap rock and creating environmental problem. In this study we simulate steam injection in a typical heavy oil reservoir (high API, shallow depth, low pressure) to enable optimization of steam injection. A model has been built using typical shallow reservoir in using Builder-CMG. Wellan data, fluid model and operating conditions (injection strategy, steam quality) and expected/ forecasted performance. CMOST package is then used to design optimization study by varying the steam injection rate. The best scenario is based on the lowest reservoir pressure and cumulative SOR. We created three development options: regular inverted 7-spot 15.5-acre pattern, horizontal well and pattern size reduction (PSR). From this numerical study it is found that for the case studied, steam injection rate can be ramped up from 250 - 300 BSPD within 6-7 years, followed by peak production. A wind down injection rate to 0 can be used after this peak production to achieve CSOR target of 3-4 bbl of steam/bbl of oil. If a quicker SBT is required, then more steam injectivity is needed to put underground. Several scenarios can be considered as follow: (1) reducing the pattern size (thus adding steam via additional injection wells) and (2) utilizing horizontal wells.","PeriodicalId":33635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Earth Energy Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Earth Energy Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25299/jeee.2023.14099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In an EOR project, process improvement must be continually pursued since EOR is often marginally profitable. In steamflood EOR project, steam injection rate is very important parameter to ensure that each pattern reach maturity within a certain early period that result in high oil recovery and meet the economic hurdles. In particularly shallow formation settings, steam injection target is often difficult to achieve because limited by fracturing pressure to avoid breaching the cap rock and creating environmental problem. In this study we simulate steam injection in a typical heavy oil reservoir (high API, shallow depth, low pressure) to enable optimization of steam injection. A model has been built using typical shallow reservoir in using Builder-CMG. Wellan data, fluid model and operating conditions (injection strategy, steam quality) and expected/ forecasted performance. CMOST package is then used to design optimization study by varying the steam injection rate. The best scenario is based on the lowest reservoir pressure and cumulative SOR. We created three development options: regular inverted 7-spot 15.5-acre pattern, horizontal well and pattern size reduction (PSR). From this numerical study it is found that for the case studied, steam injection rate can be ramped up from 250 - 300 BSPD within 6-7 years, followed by peak production. A wind down injection rate to 0 can be used after this peak production to achieve CSOR target of 3-4 bbl of steam/bbl of oil. If a quicker SBT is required, then more steam injectivity is needed to put underground. Several scenarios can be considered as follow: (1) reducing the pattern size (thus adding steam via additional injection wells) and (2) utilizing horizontal wells.
浅层油藏注汽优化数值模拟研究
在提高采收率项目中,必须不断进行过程改进,因为提高采收率通常是边际利润。在蒸汽驱提高采收率项目中,注汽速度是保证各储层在一定早期达到成熟,从而获得高采收率和经济效益的重要参数。在特别浅的地层环境中,由于压裂压力的限制,为了避免破坏盖层和造成环境问题,通常很难达到注汽目标。在这项研究中,我们模拟了典型稠油油藏(高API、浅深度、低压)的注汽,以优化注汽。以典型浅层油藏为例,用Builder-CMG建立了模型。Wellan数据,流体模型和操作条件(注入策略,蒸汽质量)以及预期/预测性能。然后利用CMOST包通过改变注汽速率进行设计优化研究。最佳方案是基于最低的油藏压力和累积SOR。我们创建了三种开发方案:常规倒置7点15.5英亩模式、水平井和模式尺寸减小(PSR)。从数值研究中发现,对于所研究的案例,在6-7年内,注汽速率可以从250 - 300 BSPD增加到峰值产量。在此峰值生产之后,可以使用降速注入速率至0,以实现3-4桶蒸汽/桶油的CSOR目标。如果需要更快的SBT,则需要将更多的蒸汽注入地下。可以考虑以下几种方案:(1)减小网纹尺寸(从而通过额外的注水井增加蒸汽)和(2)利用水平井。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信