Self-ligation in orthodontics: A more hygienic and biocompatible treatment option? A narrative review

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Amoli Singh, B. Rai, Dhruv Ahuja, M. Ashith
{"title":"Self-ligation in orthodontics: A more hygienic and biocompatible treatment option? A narrative review","authors":"Amoli Singh, B. Rai, Dhruv Ahuja, M. Ashith","doi":"10.4103/jioh.jioh_103_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Self-ligating brackets have gained popularity in the field of orthodontics over the last decade. One of the proposed advantages of the self-ligating method is the overall cleanliness of the appliance as there will be less plaque accumulation due to the absence of elastomeric rings. This review aimed to look into the effect of this system on overall oral health. Materials and Methods: Data have been collected regarding the comparison of the self-ligating bracket system to conventional techniques in relation to root resorption, dental caries, and periodontal impact. Data were obtained by an electronic search through databases of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The initial search retrieved 35 articles. After a full-text review of all the articles, only 14 were included. Results: This review article contributes to the knowledge of the effect of this system on oral tissues and its advantages and disadvantages over conventional bracket systems. In regard to root resorption, the time duration of the treatment is a more important factor than the type of bracket system used. In regard to dental caries, evidence suggests a self-ligating bracket system shows less accumulation of Streptococcus mutans when compared to a conventional bracket system. Conclusion: In the present review, the findings indicated that in relation to periodontal health self-ligating brackets are not superior to conventional brackets.","PeriodicalId":16138,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Oral Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_103_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Self-ligating brackets have gained popularity in the field of orthodontics over the last decade. One of the proposed advantages of the self-ligating method is the overall cleanliness of the appliance as there will be less plaque accumulation due to the absence of elastomeric rings. This review aimed to look into the effect of this system on overall oral health. Materials and Methods: Data have been collected regarding the comparison of the self-ligating bracket system to conventional techniques in relation to root resorption, dental caries, and periodontal impact. Data were obtained by an electronic search through databases of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The initial search retrieved 35 articles. After a full-text review of all the articles, only 14 were included. Results: This review article contributes to the knowledge of the effect of this system on oral tissues and its advantages and disadvantages over conventional bracket systems. In regard to root resorption, the time duration of the treatment is a more important factor than the type of bracket system used. In regard to dental caries, evidence suggests a self-ligating bracket system shows less accumulation of Streptococcus mutans when compared to a conventional bracket system. Conclusion: In the present review, the findings indicated that in relation to periodontal health self-ligating brackets are not superior to conventional brackets.
牙齿矫正中的自我结扎:一种更卫生和生物相容的治疗选择?叙述性回顾
目的:在过去的十年里,自结扎托槽在正畸领域越来越受欢迎。所提出的自结扎方法的优点之一是器具的整体清洁度,因为由于没有弹性环,斑块积聚较少。本综述旨在探讨该系统对整体口腔健康的影响。材料和方法:收集了自结扎托槽系统与传统技术在牙根吸收、龋齿和牙周影响方面的比较数据。数据通过PubMed、Scopus和Google Scholar的数据库进行电子搜索获得。最初的搜索检索到35篇文章。在对所有文章进行全文审查后,只收录了14篇。结果:这篇综述文章有助于了解该系统对口腔组织的影响及其与传统托槽系统相比的优缺点。就牙根吸收而言,治疗的持续时间比所用托槽系统的类型更重要。关于龋齿,有证据表明,与传统托槽系统相比,自结扎托槽系统显示出较少的变形链球菌积聚。结论:在本综述中,研究结果表明,就牙周健康而言,自结扎托槽并不优于传统托槽。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of International Oral Health
Journal of International Oral Health Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: It is a journal aimed for research, scientific facts and details covering all specialties of dentistry with a good determination for exploring and sharing the knowledge in the medical and dental fraternity. The scope is therefore huge covering almost all streams of dentistry - starting from original studies, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, very unique case reports. Our journal appreciates research articles pertaining with advancement of dentistry. Journal scope is not limited to these subjects and is more wider covering all specialities of dentistry follows: Preventive and Community Dentistry (Dental Public Health) Endodontics Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (also called Oral Surgery) Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics Periodontology (also called Periodontics) Pediatric Dentistry (also called Pedodontics) Prosthodontics (also called Prosthetic Dentistry) Oral Medicine Special Needs Dentistry (also called Special Care Dentistry) Oral Biology Forensic Odontology Geriatric Dentistry or Geriodontics Implantology Laser and Aesthetic Dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信