Numerical Evaluation of Progressive Collapse Potential in Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Various Floor Plans Due to Single Column Removal

IF 1 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Freydoon Rezaie, Seyed Mehdi Fakhradini, M. Ghahremannejad
{"title":"Numerical Evaluation of Progressive Collapse Potential in Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Various Floor Plans Due to Single Column Removal","authors":"Freydoon Rezaie, Seyed Mehdi Fakhradini, M. Ghahremannejad","doi":"10.7508/CEIJ.2018.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Progressive collapse is defined as the spread of an initial damage from one member to another, leading to extensive partial or total collapse of the structure. In this research, the potential of progressive collapse due to a sudden removal of vertical load-bearing elements in reinforced concrete buildings structures with different floor plans such as geometrical regular and irregular floor plans as well as floor plans with and without torsional irregularity were assessed. The buildings were designed according to ACI 318-14 provisions and Iranian seismic code. The progressive collapse potential of the structures was assessed following of a sudden column or shear wall removal in different locations in their first floor using nonlinear dynamic analysis (NDA). Displacement sensitivity and column sensitivity indexes were utilized to compare different cases of load-bearing element removal in each model. Results indicated that in all geometrical regular floor plan, floor plan with reentrant corner and floor plan with torsional irregularity, the most critical case of column removal was removing columns located in outer corners of the plan. In addition, removing external columns was more critical than internal columns. In buildings with shear walls, removing shear walls led to much more critical scenarios than removing columns. Furthermore, results revealed that buildings with torsional irregularity floor plan, designed according to Iranian seismic code, had a lower potential of progressive collapse rather than those buildings with no irregularity.","PeriodicalId":43959,"journal":{"name":"Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal-CEIJ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal-CEIJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7508/CEIJ.2018.02.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Progressive collapse is defined as the spread of an initial damage from one member to another, leading to extensive partial or total collapse of the structure. In this research, the potential of progressive collapse due to a sudden removal of vertical load-bearing elements in reinforced concrete buildings structures with different floor plans such as geometrical regular and irregular floor plans as well as floor plans with and without torsional irregularity were assessed. The buildings were designed according to ACI 318-14 provisions and Iranian seismic code. The progressive collapse potential of the structures was assessed following of a sudden column or shear wall removal in different locations in their first floor using nonlinear dynamic analysis (NDA). Displacement sensitivity and column sensitivity indexes were utilized to compare different cases of load-bearing element removal in each model. Results indicated that in all geometrical regular floor plan, floor plan with reentrant corner and floor plan with torsional irregularity, the most critical case of column removal was removing columns located in outer corners of the plan. In addition, removing external columns was more critical than internal columns. In buildings with shear walls, removing shear walls led to much more critical scenarios than removing columns. Furthermore, results revealed that buildings with torsional irregularity floor plan, designed according to Iranian seismic code, had a lower potential of progressive collapse rather than those buildings with no irregularity.
不同楼面结构钢筋混凝土建筑单柱拆除后连续倒塌电位的数值计算
渐进性倒塌被定义为最初的破坏从一个构件扩散到另一个构件,导致结构广泛的部分或全部倒塌。在这项研究中,我们评估了不同楼层的钢筋混凝土建筑结构(如几何规则和不规则楼层,以及有和没有扭转不规则的楼层)中垂直承重元素突然移除所导致的渐进倒塌的可能性。这些建筑是根据ACI 318-14规定和伊朗抗震规范设计的。采用非线性动力分析(NDA)对结构在一楼不同位置突然拆除柱或剪力墙后的渐进倒塌潜力进行了评估。利用位移灵敏度和柱灵敏度指标对每个模型中不同的承重单元去除情况进行比较。结果表明,在所有几何规则平面、可入角平面和扭转不规则平面中,最关键的是拆除平面外角的柱。此外,移除外部柱比移除内部柱更为关键。在有剪力墙的建筑中,拆除剪力墙会导致比拆除柱更严重的情况。此外,结果表明,根据伊朗地震规范设计的具有扭转不规则平面图的建筑物比没有不规则平面图的建筑物具有更低的渐进倒塌潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
60.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信