The idea of colonial industry in Jean Godefroy Bidima and the critique of Fabien Eboussi Boulaga

Adoulou Bitang
{"title":"The idea of colonial industry in Jean Godefroy Bidima and the critique of Fabien Eboussi Boulaga","authors":"Adoulou Bitang","doi":"10.17533/udea.ef.351763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I argue that the concept of culture industry developed by Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno had a decisive influence on Jean Godefroy Bidima’s critique of black African modernity. Drawing on some of his writings, I seek to demonstrate how Bidima’s philosophical endeavor inherits the concept of culture industry and applies it to the modern context of black Africa, where it is transformed into the concept of colonial industry. In both cases, the same critical perspective is at play, namely to formulate a broad critique of how cultural products (artworks in Horkheimer and Adorno, and philosophy in Bidima) are deprived of their substance in order to align with the mystification of the masses. The critique of the culture industry, which serves in Adorno as a fundamental critique of the production of modern art and its decadence into mass production, serves, revisited in Bidima, as a critique of modern black African philosophical discourse. With the light provided by this connection, I propose a rereading of Bidima’s critique of Fabien Eboussi Boulaga, the latter being presented as a promoter of a “discourse of mastery” in black African modern philosophy.","PeriodicalId":32344,"journal":{"name":"Estudios de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.351763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that the concept of culture industry developed by Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno had a decisive influence on Jean Godefroy Bidima’s critique of black African modernity. Drawing on some of his writings, I seek to demonstrate how Bidima’s philosophical endeavor inherits the concept of culture industry and applies it to the modern context of black Africa, where it is transformed into the concept of colonial industry. In both cases, the same critical perspective is at play, namely to formulate a broad critique of how cultural products (artworks in Horkheimer and Adorno, and philosophy in Bidima) are deprived of their substance in order to align with the mystification of the masses. The critique of the culture industry, which serves in Adorno as a fundamental critique of the production of modern art and its decadence into mass production, serves, revisited in Bidima, as a critique of modern black African philosophical discourse. With the light provided by this connection, I propose a rereading of Bidima’s critique of Fabien Eboussi Boulaga, the latter being presented as a promoter of a “discourse of mastery” in black African modern philosophy.
比迪马的殖民工业思想与Fabien Eboussi Boulaga的批判
在本文中,我认为马克斯·霍克海默和西奥多·W·阿多诺提出的文化产业概念对让·戈德福伊·比迪玛对非洲黑人现代性的批判产生了决定性的影响。根据他的一些著作,我试图证明比迪玛的哲学努力是如何继承文化产业的概念,并将其应用于非洲黑人的现代背景,在那里它被转化为殖民产业的概念。在这两种情况下,同样的批判视角在起作用,即对文化产品(霍克海默和阿多诺的艺术作品以及比迪玛的哲学作品)如何被剥夺其实质内容进行广泛的批判,以与大众的神秘感相一致。在《阿多诺》中,对文化产业的批判是对现代艺术生产及其向大规模生产的衰退的根本批判,在《比迪玛》中,它被重新审视,是对现代非洲黑人哲学话语的批判。鉴于这种联系,我建议重读比迪玛对法比安·埃博西·博拉加的批评,后者被认为是非洲黑人现代哲学“精通话语”的推动者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信