El terrorismo en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Penal Internacional para la Antigua Yugoslavia

Q4 Social Sciences
Soledad I. Castro, Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación, Argentina.
{"title":"El terrorismo en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Penal Internacional para la Antigua Yugoslavia","authors":"Soledad I. Castro, Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación, Argentina.","doi":"10.46553/PRUDENTIA.91.2021.PP.73-100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The ICTY’s Statute did not explicitly establish its jurisdiction over the crime of terror nor did it include a definition. Nonetheless, such circumstances did not prevent the tribunal from developing its own jurisprudence regarding the issue of terrorism. This article aims to compile and exam the ICTY’s case law pertaining to the evolution of the definition and criminalization of terrorism. With the focus on the case of “Prosecutor v. Stanislav Gali ć ”, it reviews its doctrine and the jurisprudence before and after it regarding those specific matters. In the final remarks, this relevant jurisprudence is assessed among other endeavors made to define terrorism in international law.","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prudentia Iuris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/PRUDENTIA.91.2021.PP.73-100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The ICTY’s Statute did not explicitly establish its jurisdiction over the crime of terror nor did it include a definition. Nonetheless, such circumstances did not prevent the tribunal from developing its own jurisprudence regarding the issue of terrorism. This article aims to compile and exam the ICTY’s case law pertaining to the evolution of the definition and criminalization of terrorism. With the focus on the case of “Prosecutor v. Stanislav Gali ć ”, it reviews its doctrine and the jurisprudence before and after it regarding those specific matters. In the final remarks, this relevant jurisprudence is assessed among other endeavors made to define terrorism in international law.
前南斯拉夫问题国际刑事法庭判例法中的恐怖主义
:前南问题国际法庭规约没有明确规定其对恐怖罪的管辖权,也没有包括定义。尽管如此,这种情况并没有阻止法庭就恐怖主义问题发展自己的判例。本文旨在汇编和审查前南问题国际法庭关于恐怖主义定义和刑事定罪演变的判例法。它以“检察官诉斯坦尼斯拉夫·加利奇案”为重点,审查了其关于这些具体事项的学说和前后判例。在最后发言中,对这一相关判例以及为在国际法中界定恐怖主义所作的其他努力进行了评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prudentia Iuris
Prudentia Iuris Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信