Freedom as a Means and a Goal in Comenius's Philosophy of Education

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Peter Kondrla
{"title":"Freedom as a Means and a Goal in Comenius's Philosophy of Education","authors":"Peter Kondrla","doi":"10.32725/cetv.2021.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the philosophical principles of the Comenius’s educational system and compares them with the postulates of contemporary pedagogy. It analyses the goals and methods of the educational process. With regard to educational goals, attention is paid on the one hand to the development of personality and, on the other hand, to social needs and interests. Educational methods are analysed and interpreted in terms of their focus on repetition of actions or on the development of competencies leading to a creative process of authentic self-realisation. Analyses and interpretations of goals and processes are synthesised into the philosophical concept of the human person. In the philosophical explanation, attention is paid to the person and his being. These are to be developed in the process of education and achieved by this process as goals. In the context of the philosophy of education, the question arises whether the goal of education is to create an individual whose actions are a repetition of learned patterns or a person who makes decisions based on moral principles. Emphasis is placed on human freedom, which is a basic precondition for decision-making and action, and which is a necessary condition for accepting responsibility. The diff erent ways of understanding freedom in Comenius’s philosophy of education and in today’s pedagogy are not only a source of criticism of pedagogy, which rejects responsibility and rational reasoning for decisions, but represent also motivation for alternative philosophical interpretation of education in the postmodern environment.","PeriodicalId":37904,"journal":{"name":"Caritas et Veritas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caritas et Veritas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32725/cetv.2021.032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The article examines the philosophical principles of the Comenius’s educational system and compares them with the postulates of contemporary pedagogy. It analyses the goals and methods of the educational process. With regard to educational goals, attention is paid on the one hand to the development of personality and, on the other hand, to social needs and interests. Educational methods are analysed and interpreted in terms of their focus on repetition of actions or on the development of competencies leading to a creative process of authentic self-realisation. Analyses and interpretations of goals and processes are synthesised into the philosophical concept of the human person. In the philosophical explanation, attention is paid to the person and his being. These are to be developed in the process of education and achieved by this process as goals. In the context of the philosophy of education, the question arises whether the goal of education is to create an individual whose actions are a repetition of learned patterns or a person who makes decisions based on moral principles. Emphasis is placed on human freedom, which is a basic precondition for decision-making and action, and which is a necessary condition for accepting responsibility. The diff erent ways of understanding freedom in Comenius’s philosophy of education and in today’s pedagogy are not only a source of criticism of pedagogy, which rejects responsibility and rational reasoning for decisions, but represent also motivation for alternative philosophical interpretation of education in the postmodern environment.
夸美纽斯教育哲学中的自由:手段与目的
本文考察了夸美纽斯教育体系的哲学原则,并将其与当代教育学的假设进行了比较。分析了教育过程的目标和方法。在教育目标方面,一方面注重个性的发展,另一方面注重社会的需要和兴趣。对教育方法进行分析和解释,重点是重复行动或发展能力,从而实现真正的自我实现的创造性过程。对目标和过程的分析和解释被综合到人的哲学概念中。在哲学解释中,关注的是人和他的存在。这些都是在教育过程中发展起来的,并作为目标通过教育过程来实现。在教育哲学的背景下,出现了这样一个问题:教育的目标是创造一个人,他的行为是对所学模式的重复,还是根据道德原则做出决定。强调人的自由,这是决策和行动的基本前提,也是承担责任的必要条件。在美纽斯的教育哲学和今天的教育学中,对自由的不同理解方式不仅是对拒绝责任和理性推理的教育学的批评来源,而且也代表了在后现代环境中对教育的另类哲学解释的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Caritas et Veritas
Caritas et Veritas Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to publish original scholarly and popular articles written by specialists working in these areas and to provide a decent platform for communication about the interaction between these fields of study. The Journal is on the List of non-impacted periodicals published in the Czech Republic. Within its orientation on Christian reflections in the context of social sciences and humanities the journal Caritas et Veritas is devoted primarily to practical matters related to ethics, the assisting professions and pedagogy.The aim of the journal is to publish original scholarly and popular articles written by specialists working in these areas and to provide a platform for communication about the interaction between these fields of study. That is why it is the editorial board''s aim to keep the entire journal easily accessible for practitioners in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The scholarly and popular sections of the journal as well as reviews of publications in Czech and Slovak language are therefore published in Czech. At the same time the editorial board strives to ensure that the scholarly studies published in the journal take account of international discourse and are accessible to it. The editorial and scholarly studies are therefore published also in English translation, scholarly studies written originally in English or another world language are also published in this way.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信