Usefulness of C-reactive Protein Testing in Acute Cough/Respiratory Tract Infection: A Case-Control Study in a UK Based GP Population

Ghosh S, Farell L, Calnan G, Panray Gb
{"title":"Usefulness of C-reactive Protein Testing in Acute Cough/Respiratory Tract Infection: A Case-Control Study in a UK Based GP Population","authors":"Ghosh S, Farell L, Calnan G, Panray Gb","doi":"10.4172/2329-9126.1000307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Point of care testing for C-reactive protein (CRP) has shown promise as a measure to reduce \n unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in respiratory tract infections (RTI) and has been adopted into NICE guidelines, \n but its use in primary care is still controversial. We aimed to evaluate the effect of CRP testing on the prescription of \n antibiotics and the outcome of patients in general practice with acute cough/RTI. \nMethods: We undertook a case-control study with POC testing with CRP in intervention group (Oct 16-Jan 17) \n and compared this to similar cohort of patients from a year previously coded with exact diagnosis. \nResults: A total of 207 patients were included: 69 in the intervention group and 138 in the control group. \nThe two groups were similar in clinical characteristics. In the intervention group, the antibiotic prescribing rate was \n 31.6%, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (59.9%) (P=0.003). \nThe recovery rate, as recorded by the GPs, was 94.9% and 93.8% in the intervention and control groups, \n respectively. Referral to Emergency Department for children under 12 was also reduced significantly in the \n intervention group (4.4%) when compared to the control group (6.5%; P=0.00479). \nConclusion: The study showed that CRP testing in patients with acute cough/RTI may reduce antibiotic \n prescribing and referral to pediatric ED, probably without compromising recovery.","PeriodicalId":90594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of general practice (Los Angeles, Calif.)","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of general practice (Los Angeles, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9126.1000307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Point of care testing for C-reactive protein (CRP) has shown promise as a measure to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in respiratory tract infections (RTI) and has been adopted into NICE guidelines, but its use in primary care is still controversial. We aimed to evaluate the effect of CRP testing on the prescription of antibiotics and the outcome of patients in general practice with acute cough/RTI. Methods: We undertook a case-control study with POC testing with CRP in intervention group (Oct 16-Jan 17) and compared this to similar cohort of patients from a year previously coded with exact diagnosis. Results: A total of 207 patients were included: 69 in the intervention group and 138 in the control group. The two groups were similar in clinical characteristics. In the intervention group, the antibiotic prescribing rate was 31.6%, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (59.9%) (P=0.003). The recovery rate, as recorded by the GPs, was 94.9% and 93.8% in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Referral to Emergency Department for children under 12 was also reduced significantly in the intervention group (4.4%) when compared to the control group (6.5%; P=0.00479). Conclusion: The study showed that CRP testing in patients with acute cough/RTI may reduce antibiotic prescribing and referral to pediatric ED, probably without compromising recovery.
c反应蛋白检测在急性咳嗽/呼吸道感染中的有效性:一项英国GP人群的病例对照研究
引言:C-反应蛋白(CRP)的护理点检测已被证明是减少呼吸道感染(RTI)中不必要的抗生素处方的一种措施,并已被纳入NICE指南,但其在初级保健中的使用仍存在争议。我们旨在评估CRP检测对抗生素处方的影响以及全科急性咳嗽/RTI患者的预后。方法:我们在干预组(10月16日至1月17日)进行了一项用CRP进行POC检测的病例对照研究,并将其与一年前编码为准确诊断的类似患者队列进行了比较。结果:共纳入207例患者:干预组69例,对照组138例。两组患者的临床特征相似。干预组的抗生素处方率为31.6%,显著低于对照组(59.9%)(P=0.003)。全科医生记录的干预组和对照组的恢复率分别为94.9%和93.8%。与对照组(6.5%;P=0.00479)相比,干预组(4.4%)12岁以下儿童转诊至急诊科的人数也显著减少。结论:研究表明,急性咳嗽/RTI患者的CRP检测可能会减少抗生素处方和转诊至儿科ED,可能不会影响康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书