Future Gold Commodity: Indonesian Ulema Council Vs Lajnah Daimah lil Buhuts al-’Ilmiyyah wal Ifta

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Ayu Rahayu Nurhalizah, Achmad Fageh
{"title":"Future Gold Commodity: Indonesian Ulema Council Vs Lajnah Daimah lil Buhuts al-’Ilmiyyah wal Ifta","authors":"Ayu Rahayu Nurhalizah, Achmad Fageh","doi":"10.31958/juris.v21i1.3647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological developments have made it easier to buy gold. Buying gold in installments or online is currently a trend and growing in Indonesia. Buying and selling transactions like this have not been explained in detail in classical fiqh. This research is a normative research with a comparative approach, namely comparing the laws of a country with the laws of one or more other countries regarding the same case. The data analysis techniques used in this article are in the form of data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of this study state that there are differences of opinion between the Indonesian Ulema Council and the Saudi Arabian Fatwa Institute. The Saudi Arabian fatwa institution issued a fatwa regarding the prohibition of buying and selling gold in futures, because gold is a type of usury property and contains 'illat as a unit of price or means of payment. Meanwhile, the National Sharia Council of the Indonesian Ulema Council stipulates a fatwa regarding the permissibility of buying and selling gold in cash or futures, because at this time, gold is no longer a price (tsaman), but gold is an ordinary merchandise or commodity. The discussion about buying and selling gold is in the realm of ijtihad, which is inseparable from differences of opinion (khilafiyah), because there is no definite text in this matter. ","PeriodicalId":31912,"journal":{"name":"Juris Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juris Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v21i1.3647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technological developments have made it easier to buy gold. Buying gold in installments or online is currently a trend and growing in Indonesia. Buying and selling transactions like this have not been explained in detail in classical fiqh. This research is a normative research with a comparative approach, namely comparing the laws of a country with the laws of one or more other countries regarding the same case. The data analysis techniques used in this article are in the form of data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of this study state that there are differences of opinion between the Indonesian Ulema Council and the Saudi Arabian Fatwa Institute. The Saudi Arabian fatwa institution issued a fatwa regarding the prohibition of buying and selling gold in futures, because gold is a type of usury property and contains 'illat as a unit of price or means of payment. Meanwhile, the National Sharia Council of the Indonesian Ulema Council stipulates a fatwa regarding the permissibility of buying and selling gold in cash or futures, because at this time, gold is no longer a price (tsaman), but gold is an ordinary merchandise or commodity. The discussion about buying and selling gold is in the realm of ijtihad, which is inseparable from differences of opinion (khilafiyah), because there is no definite text in this matter. 
未来黄金商品:印尼乌里玛理事会Vs Lajnah Daimah lil Buhuts al- ' Ilmiyyah walifta
科技的发展使得购买黄金变得更加容易。在印尼,分期付款或网上购买黄金目前是一种趋势,而且还在不断增长。像这样的买卖交易在经典的伊斯兰律法中并没有得到详细的解释。本研究是一种采用比较方法的规范性研究,即就同一案件将一国的法律与一个或多个国家的法律进行比较。本文中使用的数据分析技术采用数据简化、数据表示和得出结论的形式。这项研究的结果表明,印度尼西亚乌里玛理事会和沙特阿拉伯法特瓦研究所之间存在意见分歧。沙特阿拉伯的法特瓦机构发布了一项关于禁止在期货中买卖黄金的法特瓦,因为黄金是一种高利贷财产,含有“伊拉特”作为价格单位或支付手段。与此同时,印尼乌里玛委员会的国家伊斯兰教法委员会(National Sharia Council)规定了一项关于现金或期货买卖黄金的许可的法令,因为此时黄金不再是一种价格(tsaman),而是一种普通的商品或商品。关于买卖黄金的讨论是在ijtihad的领域,这与意见分歧(khilafiyah)是分不开的,因为在这件事上没有明确的文本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书