A checklist of the tick of vultures, with the first record of the brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus linnaei (Acari: Ixodidae) from the Indian vulture, Gyps indicus (Falconiformes: Accipitridae)

IF 1.3 3区农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY

Systematic and Applied Acarology Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI:10.11158/saa.28.5.12

A. Kazim, V. Low, V. Subramaniam, J. Houssaini, D. Tappe, C. Heo

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract We report the presence of multiple brown dog ticks (Rhicephalus linnaei) from the Indian vulture Gyps indicus. This paper constitutes the first report of this tick species from the vulture, and also the first documentation of ectoparasites from vultures in Malaysia. Additionally, we have conducted a literature review on ticks from vultures worldwide, resulting in 21 tick species consisted of six genera (Argas, Ornithodoros, Amblyomma, Hyalomma, Ixodes and Rhipicephalus) recorded from eight Old World vultures and two New World vultures. The lists of ticks infesting both vulture groups, along with pathogens detected from some of these ticks, are provided in this paper.

查看原文本刊更多论文

秃鹫蜱类清单，首次记录了印度秃鹫的棕色狗蜱Rhipcephalus linnaei（Acari：Ixodidae）Gyps indicus（猎鹰形目：鹰科）

摘要我们报道了印度秃鹫Gyps indicus身上多只棕色狗蜱（Rhicephalus linnaei）的存在。这篇论文是第一份关于秃鹫蜱类的报告，也是马来西亚秃鹫体外寄生虫的第一份文献。此外，我们对世界各地秃鹫的蜱虫进行了文献综述，从8只旧世界秃鹫和2只新世界秃鹫中记录了21种蜱虫，包括6属（Argas、Ornithodoros、Amblyoma、Hyalomma、Ixodes和Rhipicepharus）。本文提供了侵扰这两个秃鹫群体的蜱虫名单，以及从其中一些蜱虫身上检测到的病原体。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Systematic and Applied Acarology ENTOMOLOGY-

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

33.30%

发文量

152

期刊介绍： Systematic and Applied Acarology (SAA) is an international journal of the Systematic and Applied Acarology Society (SAAS). The journal is intended as a publication outlet for all acarologists in the world. There is no page charge for publishing in SAA. If the authors have funds to publish, they can pay US$20 per page to enable their papers published for open access. SAA publishes papers reporting results of original research on any aspects of mites and ticks. Due to the recent increase in submissions, SAA editors will be more selective in manuscript evaluation: (1) encouraging more high quality non-taxonomic papers to address the balance between taxonomic and non-taxonomic papers, and (2) discouraging single species description (see new special issues for single new species description) while giving priority to high quality systematic papers on comparative treatments and revisions of multiple taxa. In addition to review papers and research articles (over 4 printed pages), we welcome short correspondence (up to 4 printed pages) for condensed version of short papers, comments on other papers, data papers (with one table or figure) and short reviews or opinion pieces. The correspondence format will save space by omitting the abstract, key words, and major headings such as Introduction.