Comparison and analysis of vibration characteristics of different subway tracks

IF 0.3 4区 工程技术 Q4 ACOUSTICS
Z. Zeng, Xiangdong Huang, Weidong Wang, Xinwei Luo, Hua-tuo Yin, Zhi-peng Wu
{"title":"Comparison and analysis of vibration characteristics of different subway tracks","authors":"Z. Zeng, Xiangdong Huang, Weidong Wang, Xinwei Luo, Hua-tuo Yin, Zhi-peng Wu","doi":"10.3397/1/377112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To study the damping effect of different track structures on the environmental vibration, field tests of train-induced vertical acceleration were performed on four types of track structures, namely, ordinary track (OT), medium vibration-damping fastener track (MVDFT), floating-ladder\n track (FLT) and steel-spring floating slab track (SSFST). The measurement points were set on the rails, track slabs, and tunnel walls. Eventually, the time domain, frequency domain, and one-third- octave frequency division vibration level were adopted to investigate the vibration characteristics\n of four track structures. The results were obtained as follows. (1) The root-mean-square acceleration values of the four track structures at different measurement points were analyzed in the time domain. Overall, the results could not effectively reflect the damping capacity of the vibration-reduction\n measures. (2) Based on the one-third octave frequency analysis, regarding 10À6 m/s2 as the decibel reference value, we found that three vibration-reduction measures' vertical vibration level of the tunnel wall was significantly lower than that of OT. Specifically, the damping effect\n of SSFST was the most obvious. The Z-weighted vibration levels of the three vibration-reduction measures on the tunnel wall have been reduced by 8.919, 11.745 and 13.744 dB, respectively. (3) According to the results of the vibration-transmission characteristics in the frequency domain, the\n main vibration-frequency regions of the four track structures at the track slab and tunnel wall were all in the range of 1 to 20,00 Hz. Concerning OT, MVDFT, FLT, and SSFST, the peak values of the vibration transmission from the rail to the tunnel wall sequentially decreased, and the damping\n effect sequentially increased. This paper compared the damping capacity of the above four track structures at 1 to 80 Hz according to ISO 2631-1. In addition, their more detailed vibration characteristics at 1 to 2000 Hz were also considered. It aims to provide a more comprehensive study for\n the application of subway vibration-reduction measures.","PeriodicalId":49748,"journal":{"name":"Noise Control Engineering Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noise Control Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3397/1/377112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To study the damping effect of different track structures on the environmental vibration, field tests of train-induced vertical acceleration were performed on four types of track structures, namely, ordinary track (OT), medium vibration-damping fastener track (MVDFT), floating-ladder track (FLT) and steel-spring floating slab track (SSFST). The measurement points were set on the rails, track slabs, and tunnel walls. Eventually, the time domain, frequency domain, and one-third- octave frequency division vibration level were adopted to investigate the vibration characteristics of four track structures. The results were obtained as follows. (1) The root-mean-square acceleration values of the four track structures at different measurement points were analyzed in the time domain. Overall, the results could not effectively reflect the damping capacity of the vibration-reduction measures. (2) Based on the one-third octave frequency analysis, regarding 10À6 m/s2 as the decibel reference value, we found that three vibration-reduction measures' vertical vibration level of the tunnel wall was significantly lower than that of OT. Specifically, the damping effect of SSFST was the most obvious. The Z-weighted vibration levels of the three vibration-reduction measures on the tunnel wall have been reduced by 8.919, 11.745 and 13.744 dB, respectively. (3) According to the results of the vibration-transmission characteristics in the frequency domain, the main vibration-frequency regions of the four track structures at the track slab and tunnel wall were all in the range of 1 to 20,00 Hz. Concerning OT, MVDFT, FLT, and SSFST, the peak values of the vibration transmission from the rail to the tunnel wall sequentially decreased, and the damping effect sequentially increased. This paper compared the damping capacity of the above four track structures at 1 to 80 Hz according to ISO 2631-1. In addition, their more detailed vibration characteristics at 1 to 2000 Hz were also considered. It aims to provide a more comprehensive study for the application of subway vibration-reduction measures.
不同地铁轨道振动特性的比较分析
为了研究不同轨道结构对环境振动的阻尼作用,对普通轨道(OT)、中等减振扣件轨道(MVDFT)、浮梯轨道(FLT)和钢弹簧浮板轨道(SSFST)四种轨道结构进行了列车垂向加速度的现场试验。测量点设置在铁轨、轨道板和隧道壁上。最后,采用时域、频域和三倍频程分频振动水平对四轨道结构的振动特性进行了研究。结果如下。(1) 在时域中分析了四个轨道结构在不同测量点的加速度均方根值。总的来说,结果不能有效地反映减振措施的阻尼能力。(2) 基于三分之一倍频程频率分析,以10±6m/s2为分贝参考值,我们发现三种减振措施的隧道壁垂直振动水平显著低于OT。具体来说,SSFST的阻尼效果最为明显。隧道壁上三种减振措施的Z加权振动水平分别降低了8.919、11.745和13.744 dB。(3) 根据频域振动传递特性的结果,四种轨道结构在轨道板和隧道壁处的主要振动频率区域均在1至20,00 Hz范围内。关于OT、MVDFT、FLT和SSFST,从轨道到隧道壁的振动传递的峰值依次减小,阻尼效应依次增大。本文根据ISO2631-1标准,比较了上述四种轨道结构在1至80Hz下的阻尼能力。此外,还考虑了它们在1至2000Hz下更详细的振动特性。旨在为地铁减振措施的应用提供更全面的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Noise Control Engineering Journal
Noise Control Engineering Journal 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCEJ is the pre-eminent academic journal of noise control. It is the International Journal of the Institute of Noise Control Engineering of the USA. It is also produced with the participation and assistance of the Korean Society of Noise and Vibration Engineering (KSNVE). NCEJ reaches noise control professionals around the world, covering over 50 national noise control societies and institutes. INCE encourages you to submit your next paper to NCEJ. Choosing NCEJ: Provides the opportunity to reach a global audience of NCE professionals, academics, and students; Enhances the prestige of your work; Validates your work by formal peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信