Modelling Organizational Violence in the Covid-19 Era

Enrique Martínez-Muñoz, A. Sánchez-Sánchez, C. García-Lirios
{"title":"Modelling Organizational Violence in the Covid-19 Era","authors":"Enrique Martínez-Muñoz, A. Sánchez-Sánchez, C. García-Lirios","doi":"10.31579/2578-8868/194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of organizations and their relationship with the increasingly competitive environment, leaders have been pressured to establish control systems in which the differences between employees are exacerbated since, in the absence of labor competencies, these are They are intended to substitute for acts of loyalty to the company that lead to violence towards those who are the culprits of poor performance or are not seen as part of a working group. This is how organizational violence is justified within collaborative teams, as would be the case of Higher Education Institutions where the phenomenon is exacerbated with the emergence of electronic technologies, devices, and networks. The objective of this study was to establish the reliability and validity of an instrument that measures organizational violence. A non-experimental, cross-sectional, and confirmatory study was carried out with a non- probabilistic selection of 100 students from a public university in central Mexico. The results in general show that organizational violence would be made up of eight factors such as: prejudice, depersonalization, benevolence, harassment, subjugation, objectification, stigma, and harassment, which show the limits of the study and guidelines of research concerning equity.","PeriodicalId":73865,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neuroscience and neurological surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neuroscience and neurological surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8868/194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the context of organizations and their relationship with the increasingly competitive environment, leaders have been pressured to establish control systems in which the differences between employees are exacerbated since, in the absence of labor competencies, these are They are intended to substitute for acts of loyalty to the company that lead to violence towards those who are the culprits of poor performance or are not seen as part of a working group. This is how organizational violence is justified within collaborative teams, as would be the case of Higher Education Institutions where the phenomenon is exacerbated with the emergence of electronic technologies, devices, and networks. The objective of this study was to establish the reliability and validity of an instrument that measures organizational violence. A non-experimental, cross-sectional, and confirmatory study was carried out with a non- probabilistic selection of 100 students from a public university in central Mexico. The results in general show that organizational violence would be made up of eight factors such as: prejudice, depersonalization, benevolence, harassment, subjugation, objectification, stigma, and harassment, which show the limits of the study and guidelines of research concerning equity.
Covid-19时代的组织暴力建模
在组织及其与日益激烈的竞争环境的关系的背景下,领导者面临着建立控制系统的压力,在这种控制系统中,员工之间的差异会加剧,因为在缺乏劳动能力的情况下,它们旨在取代对公司的忠诚行为,这些行为会导致对那些表现不佳或不被视为工作组成员的人的暴力。这就是合作团队中组织暴力的正当性,就像高等教育机构的情况一样,电子技术、设备和网络的出现加剧了这种现象。本研究的目的是确定衡量组织暴力的工具的可靠性和有效性。对来自墨西哥中部一所公立大学的100名学生进行了一项非实验性、横断面和验证性的非概率性研究。结果表明,组织暴力通常由八个因素组成,如偏见、人格解体、仁爱、骚扰、征服、客体化、污名化和骚扰,这表明了公平研究的局限性和研究的指导原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信