The Rule of Law and the Welfare State: The Ways to Overcome Contradictions

Oleksii Tseliev
{"title":"The Rule of Law and the Welfare State: The Ways to Overcome Contradictions","authors":"Oleksii Tseliev","doi":"10.18523/2617-2607.2022.9-10.87-97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the establishment of the guidelines for the development of the welfare state and the rule of law in Ukraine, doctrinal debates about the content of these concepts have not stopped. Legal theoreticians, constitutionalists, jurists of the sectoral direction investigate various problematic issues related to both – the rule of law and the welfare state. Such studies mainly concern each concept taken separately. The range of scientific research is pretty wide, starting from the attempts to formulate a comprehensive definition up to efforts to provide a universal list of signs (components) of each of the named phenomena. However, many domestic researchers pay attention to the contradictions between the doctrines of the welfare state and the rule of law rather than to their separateness. These contradictions are embedded in their deep essence, and which, in their practical dimension, can hinder the development of both – the welfare state and the rule of law. Nevertheless, the Euro-Atlantic civilization, of which Ukraine sees itself as a part, is constantly moving towards the socialization of states and the development of the rule of law. This process does not take place with the same success in all states. Ukraine belongs to those states that prefer to declare this intention. There are many explanations for this state of affairs, but the author of this article focuses on only one of them, namely the unjustified interference of state institutions in the free development of society based on respect for human rights and the rule of law.The author’s conclusions relate to the ways of overcoming the existing contradictions between the two concepts. First of all, we are talking about human dignity, as the basis of all human rights, including social rights. Other ways are the application of such components of the rule of law as proportionality, limitation of discretionary powers, legal certainty, transparency and accessibility, the right to appeal, etc.","PeriodicalId":34101,"journal":{"name":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Iuridichni nauki","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Iuridichni nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2022.9-10.87-97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the establishment of the guidelines for the development of the welfare state and the rule of law in Ukraine, doctrinal debates about the content of these concepts have not stopped. Legal theoreticians, constitutionalists, jurists of the sectoral direction investigate various problematic issues related to both – the rule of law and the welfare state. Such studies mainly concern each concept taken separately. The range of scientific research is pretty wide, starting from the attempts to formulate a comprehensive definition up to efforts to provide a universal list of signs (components) of each of the named phenomena. However, many domestic researchers pay attention to the contradictions between the doctrines of the welfare state and the rule of law rather than to their separateness. These contradictions are embedded in their deep essence, and which, in their practical dimension, can hinder the development of both – the welfare state and the rule of law. Nevertheless, the Euro-Atlantic civilization, of which Ukraine sees itself as a part, is constantly moving towards the socialization of states and the development of the rule of law. This process does not take place with the same success in all states. Ukraine belongs to those states that prefer to declare this intention. There are many explanations for this state of affairs, but the author of this article focuses on only one of them, namely the unjustified interference of state institutions in the free development of society based on respect for human rights and the rule of law.The author’s conclusions relate to the ways of overcoming the existing contradictions between the two concepts. First of all, we are talking about human dignity, as the basis of all human rights, including social rights. Other ways are the application of such components of the rule of law as proportionality, limitation of discretionary powers, legal certainty, transparency and accessibility, the right to appeal, etc.
法治与福利国家:克服矛盾的途径
自乌克兰福利国家和法治发展指导方针制定以来,关于这些概念内容的理论辩论一直没有停止。法律理论家、宪法学家和部门方向的法学家调查了与法治和福利国家相关的各种问题。这类研究主要涉及每一个单独提出的概念。科学研究的范围相当广泛,从试图制定一个全面的定义开始,一直到努力提供每个命名现象的标志(组成部分)的通用列表。然而,许多国内研究者关注的是福利国家学说和法治学说之间的矛盾,而不是它们的分离。这些矛盾植根于其深层本质,在其实践层面上,可能阻碍福利国家和法治的发展。尽管如此,乌克兰视自己为其一部分的欧洲-大西洋文明正在不断走向国家社会化和法治发展。这一过程并非在所有州都取得了同样的成功。乌克兰属于那些倾向于宣布这一意图的国家。对这种状况有多种解释,但本文作者只关注其中一种,即国家机构在尊重人权和法治的基础上对社会自由发展的不合理干预。作者的结论涉及如何克服这两个概念之间存在的矛盾。首先,我们谈论的是人的尊严,作为包括社会权利在内的所有人权的基础。其他方式是适用法治的组成部分,如相称性、自由裁量权的限制、法律确定性、透明度和可及性、上诉权等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信