Packaging paradoxes in food supply chains: exploring characteristics, underlying reasons and management strategies

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Henrik Pålsson, E. Sandberg
{"title":"Packaging paradoxes in food supply chains: exploring characteristics, underlying reasons and management strategies","authors":"Henrik Pålsson, E. Sandberg","doi":"10.1108/ijpdlm-09-2019-0270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore different types of packaging paradoxes and the reasons for their existence in food supply chains.Design/methodology/approachThe research uses a multiple case study approach with rich empirical data from seven leading companies in Swedish food supply chains. The research uses coding and a paradox theory lens to analyse packaging paradoxes, both within and between companies in a supply chain.FindingsThe paper provides a novel theoretical lens which uses comprehensive empirical data to identify and categorise four types of packaging paradoxes on two system levels in food supply chains. It presents detailed descriptions of, and underlying reasons for, the paradoxes. It also discusses strategies required to manage packaging paradoxes.Research limitations/implicationsFuture research should confirm and extend the findings in this study by incorporating data from companies in other countries. It should cover the importance of paradoxes, their impact on company performance and innovation, and how different paradoxes are related to each other. It should also investigate strategies to manage paradoxes further.Practical implicationsThe findings should help companies acknowledge and identify management principles for packaging paradoxes in food supply chains.Originality/valueIt is the first study which systematically explores packaging paradoxes in food supply chains. The study offers a new approach to understand the complexity of packaging decisions in food supply chains. It contributes to the packaging logistics literature by extending theoretical knowledge about conflicts of interest related to packaging. The management discussion offers initial insights into management of packaging paradoxes and directions for future research.","PeriodicalId":14251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-09-2019-0270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore different types of packaging paradoxes and the reasons for their existence in food supply chains.Design/methodology/approachThe research uses a multiple case study approach with rich empirical data from seven leading companies in Swedish food supply chains. The research uses coding and a paradox theory lens to analyse packaging paradoxes, both within and between companies in a supply chain.FindingsThe paper provides a novel theoretical lens which uses comprehensive empirical data to identify and categorise four types of packaging paradoxes on two system levels in food supply chains. It presents detailed descriptions of, and underlying reasons for, the paradoxes. It also discusses strategies required to manage packaging paradoxes.Research limitations/implicationsFuture research should confirm and extend the findings in this study by incorporating data from companies in other countries. It should cover the importance of paradoxes, their impact on company performance and innovation, and how different paradoxes are related to each other. It should also investigate strategies to manage paradoxes further.Practical implicationsThe findings should help companies acknowledge and identify management principles for packaging paradoxes in food supply chains.Originality/valueIt is the first study which systematically explores packaging paradoxes in food supply chains. The study offers a new approach to understand the complexity of packaging decisions in food supply chains. It contributes to the packaging logistics literature by extending theoretical knowledge about conflicts of interest related to packaging. The management discussion offers initial insights into management of packaging paradoxes and directions for future research.
食品供应链中的包装悖论:探索特征,潜在原因和管理策略
目的探讨食品供应链中不同类型的包装悖论及其存在的原因。设计/方法论/方法本研究采用多案例研究方法,从瑞典食品供应链的七家领先公司获得了丰富的经验数据。该研究使用编码和悖论理论来分析供应链中公司内部和公司之间的包装悖论。发现本文提供了一个新的理论视角,利用全面的经验数据在食品供应链的两个系统层面上识别和分类了四种类型的包装悖论。它详细描述了这些悖论,并提出了其根本原因。它还讨论了管理包装悖论所需的策略。研究局限性/含义未来的研究应通过纳入其他国家公司的数据来证实和扩展本研究的发现。它应该涵盖悖论的重要性,它们对公司业绩和创新的影响,以及不同的悖论如何相互关联。它还应该研究进一步管理悖论的策略。实际含义这些发现应该有助于公司认识和确定食品供应链中包装悖论的管理原则。独创性/价值这是第一项系统探索食品供应链中包装悖论的研究。这项研究为理解食品供应链中包装决策的复杂性提供了一种新的方法。它通过扩展与包装相关的利益冲突的理论知识,为包装物流文献做出了贡献。管理层的讨论为包装悖论的管理提供了初步的见解,并为未来的研究提供了方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.40%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: IJPDLM seeks strategically focused, theoretically grounded, empirical and conceptual, quantitative and qualitative, rigorous and relevant, original research studies in logistics, physical distribution and supply chain management operations and associated strategic issues. Quantitatively oriented mathematical and modelling research papers are not suitable for IJPDLM. Desired topics include, but are not limited to: Customer service strategy Omni-channel and multi-channel distribution innovations Order processing and inventory management Implementation of supply chain processes Information and communication technology Sourcing and procurement Risk management and security Personnel recruitment and training Sustainability and environmental Collaboration and integration Global supply chain management and network complexity Information and knowledge management Legal, financial and public policy Retailing, channels and business-to-business management Organizational and human resource development Logistics and SCM education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信