{"title":"Concepciones nativas y académicas sobre los partidos políticos modernos. Reflexiones en torno al estudio del Partido Socialista argentino","authors":"Gonzalo Ezequiel Cabezas","doi":"10.35305/PROHISTORIA.VI.1239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEste articulo analiza concepciones nativas y academicas sobre los partidos politicos modernos en Argentina. Por un lado, rastreamos las caracteristicas que segun la vision de los dirigentes socialistas de comienzos de siglo XX debia tener un partido para ser considerado moderno. Por otro, observamos como importantes figuras del campo academico, desde su pertenencia politica socialista, construyeron una mirada normativa de los partidos modernos que guardo ciertas similitudes con la concepcion nativa. Por ultimo, recuperamos los estudios sobre las practicas politicas como via para repensar la politica desde sus formas concretas y no desde visiones prescriptivas cuyos supuestos no se explicitan. EnglishThis article analyzes native and academic conceptions about modern political parties in Argentina. On one hand, we trace the characteristics that according the vision of the socialist leaders from the beginnings of the twentieth century had to have a party to be considered modern. On the other hand, we observe how important figures of the academic field, from their socialist political background, constructed a normative view of the modern parties that was similar to the native conception. Finally, we retrieve the studies about political practices as a way to rethink politics from concrete experiences rather than from prescriptive visions which assumptions are not explicit.","PeriodicalId":21160,"journal":{"name":"Prohistoria","volume":"26 1","pages":"53-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prohistoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35305/PROHISTORIA.VI.1239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
espanolEste articulo analiza concepciones nativas y academicas sobre los partidos politicos modernos en Argentina. Por un lado, rastreamos las caracteristicas que segun la vision de los dirigentes socialistas de comienzos de siglo XX debia tener un partido para ser considerado moderno. Por otro, observamos como importantes figuras del campo academico, desde su pertenencia politica socialista, construyeron una mirada normativa de los partidos modernos que guardo ciertas similitudes con la concepcion nativa. Por ultimo, recuperamos los estudios sobre las practicas politicas como via para repensar la politica desde sus formas concretas y no desde visiones prescriptivas cuyos supuestos no se explicitan. EnglishThis article analyzes native and academic conceptions about modern political parties in Argentina. On one hand, we trace the characteristics that according the vision of the socialist leaders from the beginnings of the twentieth century had to have a party to be considered modern. On the other hand, we observe how important figures of the academic field, from their socialist political background, constructed a normative view of the modern parties that was similar to the native conception. Finally, we retrieve the studies about political practices as a way to rethink politics from concrete experiences rather than from prescriptive visions which assumptions are not explicit.