Too good to be true?

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Pedler
{"title":"Too good to be true?","authors":"M. Pedler","doi":"10.1080/14767333.2021.1986906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"work. We should not however forget that Leaders will be good and bad, smart and dumb, ethical and unethical, so the more that can be done to acknowledge and work with such human vulnerabilities and frailties the better. For the interested reader, the following would provide excellent follow-up material: ‘The Leadership Hubris Epidemic’ (2018) edited by Peter Garrard; ‘The Intoxication of Power’ (2016) edited by Peter Garrard and Graham Robinson; ‘Human Frailties’ (2013) edited by Ronald Burke et al. ‘The Leadership Mystique’ (2001) Manfred Kets de Vries, and ‘Understanding and Recognising Dysfunctional Leadership’ (2017) by Annette Roter. So howmight this varied collection of chapters be of practical value to action learning practitioners, you may well be asking yourself. In many ways is my response because action learning is all about enhancing the potential for constructive, ethical and sustainable organisational change. This involves engaging with, and influencing, others who may well be antagonistic to action learning initiatives. ‘Bad Leadership: Reasons and Remedies’ offers insights into some of the underlying reasons for such resistance. Resistance may have morphed into the varying varieties of toxicity, counter-productive and ‘bad’ leadership profiled in this book. Hopefully understanding – and appreciating more fully – the bases of bad leadership and toxicity outlined will heighten the awareness and sensitivity of the action learning practitioner to such ‘dangers’ both (i) when building action learning relationships with others and (ii) of their own latent susceptibilities towards bad and toxic behaviour. To conclude this, work should be of considerable interest and value to those involved in action learning because of the range and variety of leadership perspectives presented and from the insights it offers into the often convoluted dynamics of executive behaviour.","PeriodicalId":44898,"journal":{"name":"Action Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2021.1986906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

work. We should not however forget that Leaders will be good and bad, smart and dumb, ethical and unethical, so the more that can be done to acknowledge and work with such human vulnerabilities and frailties the better. For the interested reader, the following would provide excellent follow-up material: ‘The Leadership Hubris Epidemic’ (2018) edited by Peter Garrard; ‘The Intoxication of Power’ (2016) edited by Peter Garrard and Graham Robinson; ‘Human Frailties’ (2013) edited by Ronald Burke et al. ‘The Leadership Mystique’ (2001) Manfred Kets de Vries, and ‘Understanding and Recognising Dysfunctional Leadership’ (2017) by Annette Roter. So howmight this varied collection of chapters be of practical value to action learning practitioners, you may well be asking yourself. In many ways is my response because action learning is all about enhancing the potential for constructive, ethical and sustainable organisational change. This involves engaging with, and influencing, others who may well be antagonistic to action learning initiatives. ‘Bad Leadership: Reasons and Remedies’ offers insights into some of the underlying reasons for such resistance. Resistance may have morphed into the varying varieties of toxicity, counter-productive and ‘bad’ leadership profiled in this book. Hopefully understanding – and appreciating more fully – the bases of bad leadership and toxicity outlined will heighten the awareness and sensitivity of the action learning practitioner to such ‘dangers’ both (i) when building action learning relationships with others and (ii) of their own latent susceptibilities towards bad and toxic behaviour. To conclude this, work should be of considerable interest and value to those involved in action learning because of the range and variety of leadership perspectives presented and from the insights it offers into the often convoluted dynamics of executive behaviour.
太好了,不可能是真的?
工作。然而,我们不应该忘记,领导者有好有坏,有聪明有愚蠢,有道德有不道德,因此,在承认和处理这些人类弱点和弱点方面做得越多越好。对于感兴趣的读者,以下内容将提供很好的后续材料:彼得·加拉德(Peter Garrard)编辑的《领导力傲慢流行病》(2018);《权力的陶醉》(The Intoxication of Power, 2016),由彼得·加拉德和格雷厄姆·罗宾逊编辑;罗纳德·伯克等人编辑的《人性弱点》(2013年)、曼弗雷德·凯茨·德弗里斯的《领导的奥秘》(2001年)和安妮特·罗特的《理解和认识功能失调的领导》(2017年)。那么,你可能会问自己,这些不同的章节对行动学习实践者有什么实际价值呢?我的回答是,在很多方面,因为行动学习都是关于提高建设性、道德和可持续的组织变革的潜力。这包括与那些可能反对行动学习计划的人接触并影响他们。《糟糕的领导:原因与补救》一书深入探讨了这种抵制的一些潜在原因。抵抗可能已经演变成本书中描述的各种各样的毒性、反生产力和“坏”领导。希望理解——并更充分地欣赏——所概述的不良领导和毒性的基础,将提高行动学习实践者对这种“危险”的认识和敏感性,这两个方面:(1)在与他人建立行动学习关系时,以及(2)他们自己对不良和有毒行为的潜在易感性。综上所述,对于那些参与行动学习的人来说,工作应该具有相当大的兴趣和价值,因为它提出了广泛而多样的领导力视角,并提供了对高管行为往往令人费解的动态的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Action Learning
Action Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
40.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信