Reliability of Ellman Classification System in Partial Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears on Magnetic Resonance Views.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
G. İlyas, O. Gokalp
{"title":"Reliability of Ellman Classification System in Partial Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears on Magnetic Resonance Views.","authors":"G. İlyas, O. Gokalp","doi":"10.55095/achot2023/031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The current study aimed to investigate the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the Ellman classification system in partialthickness rotator cuff tears through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans instead of arthroscopic views. MATERIAL AND METHODS Pre-operative MRI scans of 45 patients, with confirmed partial-thickness rotator cuff rupture in previous arthroscopic surgeries (performed by the senior author), were obtained from Picture Archiving and Communication Systems records. The observers (n=8) were asked to categorize MRI scans according to Ellman's classification of location and grade. There were four orthopedic surgeons less experienced in rotator cuff operations in the first group and four more experienced orthopedic surgeons in the second group. They were asked to re-evaluate the MRI scans six weeks later, without access to their previous answers. Reliability evaluation was performed within and among the groups. It was also evaluated if the surgeon's experience increased the reliability of the classification. Fleiss kappa coefficient was used for the inter-observer reliability and Cohen kappa coefficient for the intra-observer reliability, and post hoc analysis was performed. RESULTS When all observers were examined in the inter-observer evaluation, it was seen that there was moderate agreement in the first location evaluation (κ=0.414); however, there was fair agreement in all other evaluations in both groups (κ=0.339- 0.383-0.337, respectively). When all observers were examined in the mean intra-observer evaluation, it was seen that there was substantial agreement in both evaluations (κ=0.795-0.721, respectively). DISCUSSION A classification system must be valid, reliable, and reproducible. It should establish a standard terminology for both surgeons and researchers. The correct identification of the tear configuration is crucial for selecting the correct repair technique. In our study, in which we evaluated the Ellman classification, which is frequently used in arthroscopic diagnosis, we investigated its intra-observer and inter-observer reliability on MRI scans. Although the mean intra-observer evaluation results were substantial agreement (κ=0.795-0.721, respectively), inter-observer evaluation results were fair agreement (κ=0.339- 0.383-0.337, respectively) except for the first location evaluation (κ=0.414). CONCLUSIONS Although intra-observer reliability was satisfactory, the Ellman system used in the classification of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears was not found to be useful by using only MRI views because of fair inter-observer reliability except for the first location evaluation, which was moderate agreement. Key words: partial, rotator cuff, tear, Ellman classification, reliability, validity.","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":"90 4 1","pages":"259-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2023/031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The current study aimed to investigate the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the Ellman classification system in partialthickness rotator cuff tears through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans instead of arthroscopic views. MATERIAL AND METHODS Pre-operative MRI scans of 45 patients, with confirmed partial-thickness rotator cuff rupture in previous arthroscopic surgeries (performed by the senior author), were obtained from Picture Archiving and Communication Systems records. The observers (n=8) were asked to categorize MRI scans according to Ellman's classification of location and grade. There were four orthopedic surgeons less experienced in rotator cuff operations in the first group and four more experienced orthopedic surgeons in the second group. They were asked to re-evaluate the MRI scans six weeks later, without access to their previous answers. Reliability evaluation was performed within and among the groups. It was also evaluated if the surgeon's experience increased the reliability of the classification. Fleiss kappa coefficient was used for the inter-observer reliability and Cohen kappa coefficient for the intra-observer reliability, and post hoc analysis was performed. RESULTS When all observers were examined in the inter-observer evaluation, it was seen that there was moderate agreement in the first location evaluation (κ=0.414); however, there was fair agreement in all other evaluations in both groups (κ=0.339- 0.383-0.337, respectively). When all observers were examined in the mean intra-observer evaluation, it was seen that there was substantial agreement in both evaluations (κ=0.795-0.721, respectively). DISCUSSION A classification system must be valid, reliable, and reproducible. It should establish a standard terminology for both surgeons and researchers. The correct identification of the tear configuration is crucial for selecting the correct repair technique. In our study, in which we evaluated the Ellman classification, which is frequently used in arthroscopic diagnosis, we investigated its intra-observer and inter-observer reliability on MRI scans. Although the mean intra-observer evaluation results were substantial agreement (κ=0.795-0.721, respectively), inter-observer evaluation results were fair agreement (κ=0.339- 0.383-0.337, respectively) except for the first location evaluation (κ=0.414). CONCLUSIONS Although intra-observer reliability was satisfactory, the Ellman system used in the classification of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears was not found to be useful by using only MRI views because of fair inter-observer reliability except for the first location evaluation, which was moderate agreement. Key words: partial, rotator cuff, tear, Ellman classification, reliability, validity.
磁共振视图下局部厚度旋转袖带撕裂Ellman分类系统的可靠性。
研究目的本研究旨在通过磁共振成像(MRI)扫描而非关节镜检查,研究Ellman分类系统在部分厚度肩袖撕裂中的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。材料和方法从图片存档和通信系统记录中获得45名患者的术前MRI扫描,这些患者在之前的关节镜手术中(由资深作者进行)确认了部分厚度的肩袖破裂。观察者(n=8)被要求根据埃尔曼的位置和级别分类对MRI扫描进行分类。在第一组中,有四名骨科医生在肩袖手术方面经验不足,在第二组中有四名经验丰富的骨科医生。六周后,他们被要求重新评估核磁共振扫描结果,但无法获得之前的答案。在组内和组间进行可靠性评估。还评估了外科医生的经验是否提高了分类的可靠性。Fleiss-kappa系数用于观察者间可靠性,Cohen kappa因子用于观察者内可靠性,并进行事后分析。结果当所有观察者在观察者间评估中接受检查时,可以看出,在第一次位置评估中存在中度一致性(κ=0.414);然而,在两组的所有其他评估中都有相当的一致性(κ分别为0.339-0.383-0.337)。当在平均观察者内部评估中检查所有观察者时,可以看出两种评估都基本一致(κ分别为0.795-0.721)。讨论分类系统必须有效、可靠和可重复。它应该为外科医生和研究人员建立一个标准术语。正确识别撕裂形态对于选择正确的修复技术至关重要。在我们的研究中,我们评估了关节镜诊断中经常使用的Ellman分类,我们在MRI扫描中研究了其观察者内和观察者间的可靠性。尽管观察者内部的平均评估结果基本一致(分别为κ=0.795-0.721),但除了第一次位置评估(κ=0.414)外,观察者之间的评估结果也基本一致(κ=0.339-0.383-0.337),仅使用MRI视图对部分厚度肩袖撕裂进行分类时使用的Ellman系统没有发现是有用的,因为除了第一次位置评估之外,观察者之间的可靠性尚可,这是适度一致的。关键词:部分,肩袖,撕裂,埃尔曼分类,可靠性,有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信