Translating Liaison Librarians to the Scientific Community

J. Atkins, Kelsey Badger, Claire Jordan, H. G. Nelsen, Katerina Ozment, Olivia Young
{"title":"Translating Liaison Librarians to the Scientific Community","authors":"J. Atkins, Kelsey Badger, Claire Jordan, H. G. Nelsen, Katerina Ozment, Olivia Young","doi":"10.7191/jeslib.2022.1229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study explores the root causes that undermine successful collaborations between scientists and their library liaisons to improve outreach to this population.\n\nMethods: This paper uses the Five Whys Technique to explore the reasons why many scientists are unaware of the breadth of services offered by liaison librarians. Existing outreach strategies that address these obstacles are interpreted through the lens of implementation science theories and process models, including Normalization Process Theory.\n\nResults: A total of four recommendations—two for liaison librarians and two for libraries as institutions—are provided to enhance the perceived value of liaison services. The recommendations for individuals include aiming to understand scientists’ needs more comprehensively and actively increasing the visibility of services that respond to those needs. Those for libraries focus on cross-functional teams and new forms of assessment.\n\nConclusions: These recommendations emphasize the benefits of collaboration to liaisons, to library programs at large, and to the faculty that liaisons serve. Implementation science can help librarians to understand why certain outreach strategies bring success, and how new services can be implemented more effectively.","PeriodicalId":90214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of escience librarianship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of escience librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2022.1229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study explores the root causes that undermine successful collaborations between scientists and their library liaisons to improve outreach to this population. Methods: This paper uses the Five Whys Technique to explore the reasons why many scientists are unaware of the breadth of services offered by liaison librarians. Existing outreach strategies that address these obstacles are interpreted through the lens of implementation science theories and process models, including Normalization Process Theory. Results: A total of four recommendations—two for liaison librarians and two for libraries as institutions—are provided to enhance the perceived value of liaison services. The recommendations for individuals include aiming to understand scientists’ needs more comprehensively and actively increasing the visibility of services that respond to those needs. Those for libraries focus on cross-functional teams and new forms of assessment. Conclusions: These recommendations emphasize the benefits of collaboration to liaisons, to library programs at large, and to the faculty that liaisons serve. Implementation science can help librarians to understand why certain outreach strategies bring success, and how new services can be implemented more effectively.
翻译联络图书馆员到科学界
目的:本研究探讨了破坏科学家及其图书馆联络人之间成功合作的根本原因,以改善对这一人群的宣传。方法:运用“五个为什么”技术,探究许多科学家不知道联络馆员所提供服务的广度的原因。通过实施科学理论和过程模型,包括规范化过程理论,对解决这些障碍的现有外联策略进行了解释。结果:共提出了四项建议,其中两项针对联络馆员,两项针对图书馆作为机构,以提高联络服务的感知价值。针对个人的建议包括旨在更全面地了解科学家的需求,并积极提高满足这些需求的服务的知名度。图书馆的重点是跨职能团队和新的评估形式。结论:这些建议强调了合作对联络人、整个图书馆项目以及联络人所服务的教师的好处。实施科学可以帮助图书馆员理解为什么某些外联策略会带来成功,以及如何更有效地实施新服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信