Research of Ancient Ukrainian Sculpture in the Works of Kyiv Circles of the Early XX Century

I. Udris
{"title":"Research of Ancient Ukrainian Sculpture in the Works of Kyiv Circles of the Early XX Century","authors":"I. Udris","doi":"10.31866/2617-7951.4.2.2021.246858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose of research. The need for a thorough scientific and theoretical consideration and generalization of the formation of systematic knowledge about the national forms of our art at the leading stages of historical development, is gaining relevance in modern domestic science of art. Among other things, it requires the study of the achievements of scientists in the study of national creative heritage in the field of sculpture of Kievan Rus and the Cossack times during the formation of scientific art history. The article is devoted to the process of formation of the concept of evolution of forms of sculpture of the old princely years and the Cossack era in the works of specialists of the early twentieth century. \nThe research methodology is based on a comprehensive historical and cultural approach, a systematic method, synchronous analysis of publications of one time period, structural analysis. This methodology allows us to consider the gradual formation of scientific views on the characteristic national differences and the direction of evolution of Ukrainian art of this period in the broader international context of artistic development. \nThe scientific novelty of the results is to determine the process of formation of objective ideas about the formal and semantic features, distinctive features and high artistic level of monuments of Ukrainian sculpture from ancient times to the end of the Cossack era based on analysis of publications of various trends of leading experts of the late XIX – XX centuries .: D. Ainalova, E. Redina, E. Kuzmina, F. Ernst, M. Makarenko, K. Shirotsky, S. Yaremich, V. Modzalevsky, F. Schmidt, devoted to the study of this branch of ancient Ukrainian art and in the context of the characteristics of the general development of fine arts, and as an independent subject of research. Conclusions. Ukrainian science of art of the early twentieth century. has achieved undeniable success in the study of national forms of domestic sculpture of ancient Slavic times, Kievan Rus and the seventeenth – eighteenth centuries. as the period of the highest prosperity. The considered material testifies to the high professional level of formation of the substantiated scientific concept of national self-sufficiency of ancient Ukrainian sculpture as an important component of the general art process at various stages of its development.","PeriodicalId":33447,"journal":{"name":"Demiurg ideyi tekhnologiyi perspektivi dizainu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demiurg ideyi tekhnologiyi perspektivi dizainu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31866/2617-7951.4.2.2021.246858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of research. The need for a thorough scientific and theoretical consideration and generalization of the formation of systematic knowledge about the national forms of our art at the leading stages of historical development, is gaining relevance in modern domestic science of art. Among other things, it requires the study of the achievements of scientists in the study of national creative heritage in the field of sculpture of Kievan Rus and the Cossack times during the formation of scientific art history. The article is devoted to the process of formation of the concept of evolution of forms of sculpture of the old princely years and the Cossack era in the works of specialists of the early twentieth century. The research methodology is based on a comprehensive historical and cultural approach, a systematic method, synchronous analysis of publications of one time period, structural analysis. This methodology allows us to consider the gradual formation of scientific views on the characteristic national differences and the direction of evolution of Ukrainian art of this period in the broader international context of artistic development. The scientific novelty of the results is to determine the process of formation of objective ideas about the formal and semantic features, distinctive features and high artistic level of monuments of Ukrainian sculpture from ancient times to the end of the Cossack era based on analysis of publications of various trends of leading experts of the late XIX – XX centuries .: D. Ainalova, E. Redina, E. Kuzmina, F. Ernst, M. Makarenko, K. Shirotsky, S. Yaremich, V. Modzalevsky, F. Schmidt, devoted to the study of this branch of ancient Ukrainian art and in the context of the characteristics of the general development of fine arts, and as an independent subject of research. Conclusions. Ukrainian science of art of the early twentieth century. has achieved undeniable success in the study of national forms of domestic sculpture of ancient Slavic times, Kievan Rus and the seventeenth – eighteenth centuries. as the period of the highest prosperity. The considered material testifies to the high professional level of formation of the substantiated scientific concept of national self-sufficiency of ancient Ukrainian sculpture as an important component of the general art process at various stages of its development.
二十世纪初基辅圈作品中的古乌克兰雕塑研究
研究目的。在历史发展的主导阶段,需要对我国艺术的民族形式进行彻底的科学和理论思考和概括,以形成系统的知识,这在现代国内艺术科学中越来越重要,这就需要研究科学艺术史形成过程中,科学家们在基凡罗斯雕塑领域和哥萨克时代的国家创意遗产研究方面所取得的成就。本文论述了二十世纪初专家作品中旧贵族时代和哥萨克时代雕塑形式演变概念的形成过程。研究方法论是基于综合历史文化方法、系统方法、同步分析一个时期的出版物、结构分析。这种方法使我们能够在更广泛的艺术发展国际背景下,考虑这一时期乌克兰艺术的特征性民族差异和演变方向的科学观点的逐步形成。该结果的科学新颖性在于,基于对19世纪末至20世纪末领先专家的各种趋势的出版物的分析,确定了从古代到哥萨克时代末乌克兰雕塑纪念碑的形式和语义特征、独特特征和高艺术水平的客观思想的形成过程D.Ainalova、E.Redina、E.Kuzmina、F.Ernst、M.Makarenko、K.Shirotsky、S.Yaremich、V.Modzalevsky、F.Schmidt,致力于研究乌克兰古代艺术的这一分支,并在美术普遍发展的特征背景下,作为一个独立的研究课题。结论。二十世纪初的乌克兰艺术科学。在研究古斯拉夫时代、基文罗斯和十七至十八世纪的国内雕塑民族形式方面取得了不可否认的成功。作为最高繁荣时期。所考虑的材料证明了乌克兰古代雕塑作为其发展各个阶段的一般艺术过程的重要组成部分,其国家自给自足的科学概念的形成具有很高的专业水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书