Functional paradox of leptin and adiponectin in diabetes patients and controls in the Cape Coast Metropolis of Ghana

Q4 Medicine
S. Acquah, J. N. Boampong, B. A. E. Jnr
{"title":"Functional paradox of leptin and adiponectin in diabetes patients and controls in the Cape Coast Metropolis of Ghana","authors":"S. Acquah, J. N. Boampong, B. A. E. Jnr","doi":"10.4103/MJDRDYPU.MJDRDYPU_271_16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To investigate the concept of obesity paradox in diabetes patients and nondiabetic control in the Cape Coast Metropolis of Ghana. Materials and Methods: Levels of leptin, adiponectin, total antioxidant power (TAP), lipid peroxides, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were assessed in 115 diabetics and an equal number of control respondents. Furthermore, various anthropometric indices and blood pressure were measured using standard methods. Levels of biomarkers were compared between groups based on body mass index or blood pressure classifications. Results: Control respondents exhibited higher ( P P P > 0.05) mean levels of the various biomarkers, except TAP level which was higher ( P P P > 0.05) levels of the other biomarkers between diabetes patients and their control counterpart. Irrespective of diabetes, obesity, or hypertensive status, leptin associated positively with various measures of adiposity. Adiponectin correlated positively with leptin ( R > 0.38; P Conclusion: Overweight/obese respondents appear metabolically healthier than their normal-weight counterparts. However, further studies are needed for proper understanding of this concept in the Ghanaian context.","PeriodicalId":36033,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University","volume":"10 1","pages":"268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/MJDRDYPU.MJDRDYPU_271_16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the concept of obesity paradox in diabetes patients and nondiabetic control in the Cape Coast Metropolis of Ghana. Materials and Methods: Levels of leptin, adiponectin, total antioxidant power (TAP), lipid peroxides, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were assessed in 115 diabetics and an equal number of control respondents. Furthermore, various anthropometric indices and blood pressure were measured using standard methods. Levels of biomarkers were compared between groups based on body mass index or blood pressure classifications. Results: Control respondents exhibited higher ( P P P > 0.05) mean levels of the various biomarkers, except TAP level which was higher ( P P P > 0.05) levels of the other biomarkers between diabetes patients and their control counterpart. Irrespective of diabetes, obesity, or hypertensive status, leptin associated positively with various measures of adiposity. Adiponectin correlated positively with leptin ( R > 0.38; P Conclusion: Overweight/obese respondents appear metabolically healthier than their normal-weight counterparts. However, further studies are needed for proper understanding of this concept in the Ghanaian context.
加纳开普海岸大都市糖尿病患者和对照组瘦素和脂联素的功能悖论
目的:调查加纳开普海岸大都市糖尿病患者肥胖悖论的概念和非糖尿病控制。材料和方法:评估115名糖尿病患者和同等数量的对照组患者的瘦素、脂联素、总抗氧化能力(TAP)、脂质过氧化物和C反应蛋白(CRP)水平。此外,还使用标准方法测量了各种人体测量指标和血压。根据体重指数或血压分类比较各组之间的生物标志物水平。结果:对照组受试者的各种生物标志物的平均水平较高(P P>0.05),但TAP水平高于糖尿病患者和对照组的其他生物标志物水平(P P<0.05)。无论糖尿病、肥胖或高血压状况如何,瘦素都与各种肥胖指标呈正相关。脂联素与瘦素呈正相关(R>0.38;P结论:超重/肥胖的受访者在代谢方面比正常体重的受访者更健康。然而,需要进一步的研究才能在加纳正确理解这一概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信