Revealing embedded carbon emissions within the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
S. Hasan, Michael O. Wood, S. Singh
{"title":"Revealing embedded carbon emissions within the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership","authors":"S. Hasan, Michael O. Wood, S. Singh","doi":"10.1080/09535314.2021.1964941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), representing approximately USD 13.5 trillion of the global GDP, is one of the largest free-trade agreements in the world. This trade agreement considers many important issues yet fails to address climate change or carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. CO2 emissions in trade are critical as all CPTPP parties have made significant carbon emissions reduction commitments of between 8-36% through the COP21- Paris Agreement. Herein lies a paradox. This study assesses the amount of embedded CO2 emissions in the CPTPP through an input-output analysis of consumption-based emissions in ten carbon-intensive sectors, under three scenarios. The results reveal that as trade between partners increases, so will CO2 emissions across those sectors. These findings are essential for policymakers who are striving to grow Partnerships (Sustainable Development Goal 17) while seeking to address Climate Action (Sustainable Development Goal 13), which appear to be conflicting goals.","PeriodicalId":47760,"journal":{"name":"Economic Systems Research","volume":"34 1","pages":"294 - 319"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2021.1964941","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), representing approximately USD 13.5 trillion of the global GDP, is one of the largest free-trade agreements in the world. This trade agreement considers many important issues yet fails to address climate change or carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. CO2 emissions in trade are critical as all CPTPP parties have made significant carbon emissions reduction commitments of between 8-36% through the COP21- Paris Agreement. Herein lies a paradox. This study assesses the amount of embedded CO2 emissions in the CPTPP through an input-output analysis of consumption-based emissions in ten carbon-intensive sectors, under three scenarios. The results reveal that as trade between partners increases, so will CO2 emissions across those sectors. These findings are essential for policymakers who are striving to grow Partnerships (Sustainable Development Goal 17) while seeking to address Climate Action (Sustainable Development Goal 13), which appear to be conflicting goals.
揭示《全面与进步跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》隐含的碳排放
《全面与进步跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》(CPTPP)是世界上最大的自由贸易协定之一,约占全球GDP的13.5万亿美元。该贸易协定考虑了许多重要问题,但未能解决气候变化或二氧化碳排放问题。贸易中的二氧化碳排放至关重要,因为所有CPTPP缔约方都通过COP21-巴黎协定做出了8-36%的重大碳减排承诺。这里存在一个悖论。本研究通过对10个碳密集型行业基于消费的排放进行投入产出分析,在三种情景下评估CPTPP中隐含的二氧化碳排放量。结果表明,随着合作伙伴之间的贸易增加,这些部门的二氧化碳排放量也会增加。这些发现对于正在努力发展伙伴关系(可持续发展目标17),同时寻求解决气候行动(可持续发展目标13)的政策制定者至关重要,这两个目标似乎是相互冲突的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Economic Systems Research is a double blind peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to the furtherance of theoretical and factual knowledge about economic systems, structures and processes, and their change through time and space, at the subnational, national and international level. The journal contains sensible, matter-of-fact tools and data for modelling, policy analysis, planning and decision making in large economic environments. It promotes understanding in economic thinking and between theoretical schools of East and West, North and South.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信