Deliberate legislative reforms to improve the legislation quality in developing countries: case of Indonesia

IF 1.5 Q1 LAW

Theory and Practice of Legislation Pub Date : 2022-06-07 DOI:10.1080/20508840.2022.2080392

Bagus Hermanto

引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT The use of legislative reforms as a prominent agenda by developing countries to deliberate various programs and improve legislation quality through rapprochement depends on their abilities, willingness, institutions, and legal perspectives. Therefore, this research considered, determined, and analysed reform rapprochements in Indonesia, highlighted constraints, and proposed approaches to promote effective and efficient legislative quality improvement. These findings revealed several qualitative approaches and measures to determine reform implementations and their impact on legislative quality.

查看原文本刊更多论文

发展中国家通过立法改革提高立法质量:以印度尼西亚为例

发展中国家将立法改革作为一项重要议程，通过和解来审议各种方案并提高立法质量，这取决于发展中国家的能力、意愿、制度和法律视角。因此，本研究考虑、确定和分析了印度尼西亚的改革和解，突出了制约因素，并提出了促进有效和高效的立法质量改进的方法。这些调查结果揭示了确定改革实施及其对立法质量影响的若干定性方法和措施。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Theory and Practice of Legislation LAW-

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Theory and Practice of Legislation aims to offer an international and interdisciplinary forum for the examination of legislation. The focus of the journal, which succeeds the former title Legisprudence, remains with legislation in its broadest sense. Legislation is seen as both process and product, reflection of theoretical assumptions and a skill. The journal addresses formal legislation, and its alternatives (such as covenants, regulation by non-state actors etc.). The editors welcome articles on systematic (as opposed to historical) issues, including drafting techniques, the introduction of open standards, evidence-based drafting, pre- and post-legislative scrutiny for effectiveness and efficiency, the utility and necessity of codification, IT in legislation, the legitimacy of legislation in view of fundamental principles and rights, law and language, and the link between legislator and judge. Comparative and interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged. But dogmatic descriptions of positive law are outside the scope of the journal. The journal offers a combination of themed issues and general issues. All articles are submitted to double blind review.