Bank capital, liquidity and risk in Ghana

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Emmanuel Carsamer, Anthony Abbam, Y. N. Queku
{"title":"Bank capital, liquidity and risk in Ghana","authors":"Emmanuel Carsamer, Anthony Abbam, Y. N. Queku","doi":"10.1108/jfrc-12-2020-0117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nCapital, risk and liquidity are the vitality of the banking industry, which can improve the efficiency of banking and promote the efficiency of resource allocation. The purpose of this study is to examine how Basel III new liquidity ratios affect bank capital and risk adjustments and how banks respond to the new liquidity rules.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors adopted the system generalized method of moments (GMM) to examine how Basel III new liquidity ratios affect bank capital and risk adjustments and how banks respond to the new liquidity rules. Based on the call reports data from banks, GMM was used to test the hypotheses that new liquidity ratios affect bank capital and risk adjustments, as well as how banks respond to the regulation.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results indicate banks targeted capital, risk and liquidity and simultaneously coordinate short-term adjustments in capital and risk. New liquidity measures enable banks to coordinate risk and liquidity decisions. Short-term adjustments in new liquidity rules inversely impact bank capital. Short-term adjustments in new liquidity rules inversely impact bank capital and capital adjustments adversely affect changes in the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR).\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe primary results revealed that Ghanaian banks simultaneously coordinate and target capital, risk exposure and liquidity level. Also, capital adjustments positively influence risk adjustments and vice versa while bidirectional negative coordination exists between bank capital and risk on one hand and liquidity on the other hand. Short-term adjustments in new liquidity rule inversely impact bank capital and capital adjustments adversely affect changes in the LCR. The findings partially confirm the theoretical predictions of Repullo (2005) regarding the negative links between capital, risk and liquidity but the authors have higher capital induces higher risk.\n\n\nPractical implications\nBanks should balance off their targeted risk and liquidity in order not to sacrifice capital accumulation for liquidity.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research offers new contributions in the research of bank management of capital and liquidity toward banks during a financial crisis from a theoretical perspective and trust management from an applicative perspective.\n","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfrc-12-2020-0117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose Capital, risk and liquidity are the vitality of the banking industry, which can improve the efficiency of banking and promote the efficiency of resource allocation. The purpose of this study is to examine how Basel III new liquidity ratios affect bank capital and risk adjustments and how banks respond to the new liquidity rules. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopted the system generalized method of moments (GMM) to examine how Basel III new liquidity ratios affect bank capital and risk adjustments and how banks respond to the new liquidity rules. Based on the call reports data from banks, GMM was used to test the hypotheses that new liquidity ratios affect bank capital and risk adjustments, as well as how banks respond to the regulation. Findings The results indicate banks targeted capital, risk and liquidity and simultaneously coordinate short-term adjustments in capital and risk. New liquidity measures enable banks to coordinate risk and liquidity decisions. Short-term adjustments in new liquidity rules inversely impact bank capital. Short-term adjustments in new liquidity rules inversely impact bank capital and capital adjustments adversely affect changes in the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR). Research limitations/implications The primary results revealed that Ghanaian banks simultaneously coordinate and target capital, risk exposure and liquidity level. Also, capital adjustments positively influence risk adjustments and vice versa while bidirectional negative coordination exists between bank capital and risk on one hand and liquidity on the other hand. Short-term adjustments in new liquidity rule inversely impact bank capital and capital adjustments adversely affect changes in the LCR. The findings partially confirm the theoretical predictions of Repullo (2005) regarding the negative links between capital, risk and liquidity but the authors have higher capital induces higher risk. Practical implications Banks should balance off their targeted risk and liquidity in order not to sacrifice capital accumulation for liquidity. Originality/value This research offers new contributions in the research of bank management of capital and liquidity toward banks during a financial crisis from a theoretical perspective and trust management from an applicative perspective.
加纳的银行资本、流动性和风险
目的资本、风险和流动性是银行业的活力,可以提高银行业的效率,促进资源配置的效率。本研究的目的是研究巴塞尔协议III新的流动性比率如何影响银行资本和风险调整,以及银行如何应对新的流动资金规则。设计/方法/方法作者采用系统广义矩法(GMM)来研究巴塞尔协议III新的流动性比率如何影响银行资本和风险调整,以及银行如何应对新的流动资金规则。基于银行的电话报告数据,GMM用于检验新的流动性比率影响银行资本和风险调整的假设,以及银行如何应对监管。研究结果表明,银行以资本、风险和流动性为目标,同时协调资本和风险的短期调整。新的流动性措施使银行能够协调风险和流动性决策。新流动性规则的短期调整会对银行资本产生负面影响。新流动性规则的短期调整会对银行资本产生负面影响,资本调整会对流动性覆盖率(LCR)的变化产生负面影响。研究局限性/含义初步结果显示,加纳银行同时协调和瞄准资本、风险敞口和流动性水平。此外,资本调整对风险调整有正向影响,反之亦然,而银行资本与风险和流动性之间存在双向负协调。新流动性规则中的短期调整对银行资本产生不利影响,资本调整对LCR的变化产生不利影响。研究结果部分证实了Repullo(2005)关于资本、风险和流动性之间负联系的理论预测,但作者认为较高的资本会导致较高的风险。实际含义银行应该平衡其目标风险和流动性,以免为了流动性而牺牲资本积累。原创性/价值本研究从理论角度对金融危机期间银行对银行的资本和流动性管理以及从应用角度对信托管理的研究做出了新的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信