The impact of using Direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS ) evaluation method on the some clinical skills of midwifery students

A. Shayan, Z. Masoumi, K. Oshvandi, S. Tohidi, Batoul Khodakarami, Hadis Sourinejad
{"title":"The impact of using Direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS ) evaluation method on the some clinical skills of midwifery students","authors":"A. Shayan, Z. Masoumi, K. Oshvandi, S. Tohidi, Batoul Khodakarami, Hadis Sourinejad","doi":"10.22038/FMEJ.2020.43601.1294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The present study was done in order to evaluate the students’ clinical skill, enhance the quality of cares given, and consider limitations of common evaluation ways, as well as loss of texts about impact of new evaluation in education. The aim of this study was the impact of using direct observation of procedural skill (DOPS) evaluation method on some clinical skills of midwifery students. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was performed on 70 midwifery students in the delivery ward of Fatemieh Hospital in Hamadan during the first semester of 2017-2018. In this stage, the students in the control group were evaluated according to the current method of the faculty and the experimental group was evaluated by the DOPS method through a checklist. Finally, the evaluation scores of students were compared in both control and experimental groups. Results: According to T-test results, the average score in vaginal examination, Leopold maneuver and hearing fetal heart rate has been equal before doing the test (P>0.05); however, after intervention the difference between the results obtained from these two groups was significant (p 0.05), the scores have significantly increased in test group (p <0.05). Conclusion: Findings showed that using DOPSevaluation way can be effective in enhancing clinical skills of midwifery students in vaginal examination; however, Leopold maneuver and hearing fetal heart rate are recommended for other procedures.","PeriodicalId":34243,"journal":{"name":"Future of Medical Education Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"40-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future of Medical Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/FMEJ.2020.43601.1294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The present study was done in order to evaluate the students’ clinical skill, enhance the quality of cares given, and consider limitations of common evaluation ways, as well as loss of texts about impact of new evaluation in education. The aim of this study was the impact of using direct observation of procedural skill (DOPS) evaluation method on some clinical skills of midwifery students. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was performed on 70 midwifery students in the delivery ward of Fatemieh Hospital in Hamadan during the first semester of 2017-2018. In this stage, the students in the control group were evaluated according to the current method of the faculty and the experimental group was evaluated by the DOPS method through a checklist. Finally, the evaluation scores of students were compared in both control and experimental groups. Results: According to T-test results, the average score in vaginal examination, Leopold maneuver and hearing fetal heart rate has been equal before doing the test (P>0.05); however, after intervention the difference between the results obtained from these two groups was significant (p 0.05), the scores have significantly increased in test group (p <0.05). Conclusion: Findings showed that using DOPSevaluation way can be effective in enhancing clinical skills of midwifery students in vaginal examination; however, Leopold maneuver and hearing fetal heart rate are recommended for other procedures.
应用程序技能直接观察(DOPS)评价方法对助产学学生临床技能的影响
背景:本研究旨在评估学生的临床技能,提高护理质量,并考虑到常用评估方法的局限性,以及新评估在教育中的影响的文献缺失。本研究旨在探讨应用程序技能直接观察(DOPS)评价方法对助产学学生某些临床技能的影响。方法:对2017-2018年第一学期在哈马丹市法特米耶医院分娩病房的70名助产学学生进行准实验研究。在这一阶段,对照组学生按照学院现行的评估方法进行评估,实验组学生通过检查表采用DOPS方法进行评估。最后比较对照组和实验组学生的评价分数。结果:t检验结果显示,术前阴道检查、利奥波德手法、听力胎心平均评分相等(P < 0.05);但干预后两组结果差异有统计学意义(p <0.05),试验组得分明显提高(p <0.05)。结论:应用多普勒评价方法能有效提高助产学生阴道检查的临床技能;然而,利奥波德手法和听力胎儿心率推荐用于其他手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信