Dynamic response of reinforced concrete beams subjected to low velocity impact loads using nonlinear finite element analysis

Q1 Engineering
W. Abdulsahib, Bayrak S. Almuhsin, M. Abduljabbar
{"title":"Dynamic response of reinforced concrete beams subjected to low velocity impact loads using nonlinear finite element analysis","authors":"W. Abdulsahib, Bayrak S. Almuhsin, M. Abduljabbar","doi":"10.21533/pen.v11i3.3554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of a nonlinear finite element method (FEM) for examining how reinforced concrete (RC) beams react to dynamic forces under the action of low-velocity impacting loads is presented in this article. The model was employed to analyze the stress distributions along with the time histories of impacting load and beam deflection, which were presented graphically. Comparisons with experimental data from previously conducted studies have been performed to verify the precision of the studied model. The findings demonstrated that the developed model was acceptable. Furthermore, the study performed a detailed parametric analysis, focusing on various factors such as replacing conventional steel bars with FRP bars, increasing concrete compressive strength, changing the impact location, using different diameters of reinforcing bars, and changing the depth of the concrete beam. According to the findings, using FRP bars resulted in 36% less peak load due to the uplift pressure caused by the FRP bars' high strength, while the maximum observed deflection of the beam reinforced with FRP bars decreased by approximately 9%. When the position of the impacting force was applied at one-third of the span of the beam, deflection was decreased by 12% when compared to the RC beam has been impacted at its midspan. In addition, the depth of the beams had a significant impact on the impacting load. These presented findings of the study may contribute to a better understanding of how a structure made of concrete responds to impacting loading.","PeriodicalId":37519,"journal":{"name":"Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v11i3.3554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of a nonlinear finite element method (FEM) for examining how reinforced concrete (RC) beams react to dynamic forces under the action of low-velocity impacting loads is presented in this article. The model was employed to analyze the stress distributions along with the time histories of impacting load and beam deflection, which were presented graphically. Comparisons with experimental data from previously conducted studies have been performed to verify the precision of the studied model. The findings demonstrated that the developed model was acceptable. Furthermore, the study performed a detailed parametric analysis, focusing on various factors such as replacing conventional steel bars with FRP bars, increasing concrete compressive strength, changing the impact location, using different diameters of reinforcing bars, and changing the depth of the concrete beam. According to the findings, using FRP bars resulted in 36% less peak load due to the uplift pressure caused by the FRP bars' high strength, while the maximum observed deflection of the beam reinforced with FRP bars decreased by approximately 9%. When the position of the impacting force was applied at one-third of the span of the beam, deflection was decreased by 12% when compared to the RC beam has been impacted at its midspan. In addition, the depth of the beams had a significant impact on the impacting load. These presented findings of the study may contribute to a better understanding of how a structure made of concrete responds to impacting loading.
钢筋混凝土梁在低速冲击荷载作用下的动力响应非线性有限元分析
本文介绍了一种用于研究钢筋混凝土梁在低速冲击荷载作用下对动力的反应的非线性有限元方法的发展。利用该模型对应力随冲击载荷和梁挠度时程的分布进行了分析,并以图形化的形式给出了计算结果。与先前进行的研究的实验数据进行了比较,以验证所研究模型的精度。结果表明,所建立的模型是可以接受的。此外,研究还进行了详细的参数分析,重点考虑了用FRP筋代替常规钢筋、提高混凝土抗压强度、改变冲击位置、使用不同直径的钢筋、改变混凝土梁的深度等因素。结果表明,由于FRP筋的高强度引起的上拉压力,使用FRP筋的梁的峰值荷载降低了36%,而FRP筋加固的梁的最大观测挠度降低了约9%。当冲击力施加在梁跨的三分之一位置时,与RC梁在跨中受到冲击相比,挠度减小了12%。此外,梁的深度对冲击载荷有显著影响。这些研究结果可能有助于更好地理解混凝土结构对冲击载荷的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: *Industrial Engineering: 1 . Ergonomics 2 . Manufacturing 3 . TQM/quality engineering, reliability/maintenance engineering 4 . Production Planning 5 . Facility location, layout, design, materials handling 6 . Education, case studies 7 . Inventory, logistics, transportation, supply chain management 8 . Management 9 . Project/operations management, scheduling 10 . Information systems for production and management 11 . Innovation, knowledge management, organizational learning *Mechanical Engineering: 1 . Energy 2 . Machine Design 3 . Engineering Materials 4 . Manufacturing 5 . Mechatronics & Robotics 6 . Transportation 7 . Fluid Mechanics 8 . Optical Engineering 9 . Nanotechnology 10 . Maintenance & Safety *Computer Science: 1 . Computational Intelligence 2 . Computer Graphics 3 . Data Mining 4 . Human-Centered Computing 5 . Internet and Web Computing 6 . Mobile and Cloud computing 7 . Software Engineering 8 . Online Social Networks *Electrical and electronics engineering 1 . Sensor, automation and instrumentation technology 2 . Telecommunications 3 . Power systems 4 . Electronics 5 . Nanotechnology *Architecture: 1 . Advanced digital applications in architecture practice and computation within Generative processes of design 2 . Computer science, biology and ecology connected with structural engineering 3 . Technology and sustainability in architecture *Bioengineering: 1 . Medical Sciences 2 . Biological and Biomedical Sciences 3 . Agriculture and Life Sciences 4 . Biology and neuroscience 5 . Biological Sciences (Botany, Forestry, Cell Biology, Marine Biology, Zoology) [...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信