The Coda Voicing Contrast in Lithuanian Learners’ English

IF 0.1 4区 文学 Q3 HISTORY
Verbum Pub Date : 2018-12-20 DOI:10.15388/VERB.2018.2
Lina Bikelienė, Milda Vaitkevičiūtė
{"title":"The Coda Voicing Contrast in Lithuanian Learners’ English","authors":"Lina Bikelienė, Milda Vaitkevičiūtė","doi":"10.15388/VERB.2018.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[full article and abstract in English] \nVowel duration, though not belonging to the three main factors in the decription of vowels, plays an important role in the English language. Alongside qualitative differences, it helps to distinguish between the meaning of such words as ‘ship’ and ‘sheep’. Vowel duration has been recognised to be a complex phenomenon, which depends on a combination of factors: internal and external (Delattre 1962). The present pilot study focuses on one of the factors belonging to the latter group, i.e. the influence of the postvocalic voicing on vowel duration in minimal pairs of one sylable CVC (consonant-vowel-consonant) words, a phenomenon reffered to as ‘pre-fortis clipping’ (Wells 1990), ‘voicing effect’ (Yoneyama and Kitahara 2014), ‘consonantal voicing effect’ (Beller-Marino 2014), ‘vowel-length effect’ (Ko 2007), ‘shortening’ (Cruttenden 2014), ‘post-vocalic consonant voicing effect’ (Taubeber and Evanini 2009), etc. The scope of this research was limited to four checked unrounded English monophthongs: the front-central, close-mid /ɪ/, the front, mid /e/, the front, open /æ/, and the central, open-mid /ʌ/. The durational differences were analysed from a perceptive and productive perspectives. The obtained results indicated that the Lithuanian learners showed an effect of voicing on vowel-duration, manifested in a number of languages: the mean duration of the examined vowels was shorter before a fortis than before a lenis coda. The analysis of individual students’ production data proved the importance of the individual variable.","PeriodicalId":42449,"journal":{"name":"Verbum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Verbum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/VERB.2018.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

[full article and abstract in English] Vowel duration, though not belonging to the three main factors in the decription of vowels, plays an important role in the English language. Alongside qualitative differences, it helps to distinguish between the meaning of such words as ‘ship’ and ‘sheep’. Vowel duration has been recognised to be a complex phenomenon, which depends on a combination of factors: internal and external (Delattre 1962). The present pilot study focuses on one of the factors belonging to the latter group, i.e. the influence of the postvocalic voicing on vowel duration in minimal pairs of one sylable CVC (consonant-vowel-consonant) words, a phenomenon reffered to as ‘pre-fortis clipping’ (Wells 1990), ‘voicing effect’ (Yoneyama and Kitahara 2014), ‘consonantal voicing effect’ (Beller-Marino 2014), ‘vowel-length effect’ (Ko 2007), ‘shortening’ (Cruttenden 2014), ‘post-vocalic consonant voicing effect’ (Taubeber and Evanini 2009), etc. The scope of this research was limited to four checked unrounded English monophthongs: the front-central, close-mid /ɪ/, the front, mid /e/, the front, open /æ/, and the central, open-mid /ʌ/. The durational differences were analysed from a perceptive and productive perspectives. The obtained results indicated that the Lithuanian learners showed an effect of voicing on vowel-duration, manifested in a number of languages: the mean duration of the examined vowels was shorter before a fortis than before a lenis coda. The analysis of individual students’ production data proved the importance of the individual variable.
立陶宛语学习者英语尾韵对比
元音音长虽然不属于元音描述的三个主要因素,但在英语语言中起着重要的作用。除了质量上的差异,它还有助于区分“船”和“羊”等词的含义。元音持续时间被认为是一个复杂的现象,它取决于内部和外部因素的组合(Delattre 1962)。目前的试点研究侧重于后一组因素之一,即后发声对单音节CVC(辅音-元音-辅音)单词最小对中元音持续时间的影响,这种现象被称为“前辅音剪切”(Wells 1990)、“发声效应”(Yoneyama and Kitahara 2014)、“辅音发声效应”(Beller-Marino 2014)、“元音长度效应”(Ko 2007)、“缩短效应”(Cruttenden 2014)。“语音后辅音发声效应”(Taubeber and Evanini 2009)等。这项研究的范围仅限于四个检查过的不圆整的英语单音节音:front-central, close-mid / /, front, mid /e/, front, open /æ/和central, open-mid / /。从感知和生产的角度分析了持续时间的差异。结果表明,立陶宛语学习者表现出发声对元音持续时间的影响,这在许多语言中都有体现:被测元音的平均持续时间在连音结束前比在lenis结束前短。通过对学生个体生产数据的分析,证明了个体变量的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Verbum
Verbum Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信