The Peculiarities of the Organizational Learning of Clinicians and their Causes

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
P. Jucevičienė, Akvilė Sadauskienė, Robert Leščinskij
{"title":"The Peculiarities of the Organizational Learning of\n Clinicians and their Causes","authors":"P. Jucevičienė, Akvilė Sadauskienė, Robert Leščinskij","doi":"10.34190/EJKM.18.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The perception of knowledge management has evolved over the last several decades from managing the information to the involvement of employees in knowledge work – in particular, in the OL processes. However, research literature describes various obstacles for organizational learning in hospitals, related to both, the context of the organization’s activities, as well as the clash between the professional autonomy of the clinicians and the bureaucratic requirements regulating the work done by the clinicians. This paper looks into the peculiarities of the OL of clinicians occurring on both individual and collective levels and examines the causes that condition these peculiarities. The paper opens with an introduction, wherein the research problem is substantiated, the aim of the research and the conceptual positions are provided, the logical structure of the research is outlined. The literature review conducted in the second chapter reveals the essence of organizational learning, explains the significance of individual and collective learning for OL. Next, the researchers delve into the work done by clinicians as professionals in the context of OL. The steps taken allow substantiating the three levels of clinicians’ involvement in the OL processes – individual, group/department and organization‑as‑a‑whole. A thorough review of the theoretical background created the conditions for the empirical investigation into the organizational learning of clinicians. The research has been conducted in a small hospital in Lithuania. Highly selective sampling suggests that the data on the OL of the clinicians acquired during the research, and a detailed description of its relation to the context provides reliable insights into various aspects of the organizational learning of clinicians. The conclusions also raise questions that require further investigation, suggest health care administrators and clinicians consider collective efforts to create better quality organizational knowledge that would enable healthcare institutions to cope with continuously emerging ill‑structured problems.","PeriodicalId":37211,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/EJKM.18.03.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The perception of knowledge management has evolved over the last several decades from managing the information to the involvement of employees in knowledge work – in particular, in the OL processes. However, research literature describes various obstacles for organizational learning in hospitals, related to both, the context of the organization’s activities, as well as the clash between the professional autonomy of the clinicians and the bureaucratic requirements regulating the work done by the clinicians. This paper looks into the peculiarities of the OL of clinicians occurring on both individual and collective levels and examines the causes that condition these peculiarities. The paper opens with an introduction, wherein the research problem is substantiated, the aim of the research and the conceptual positions are provided, the logical structure of the research is outlined. The literature review conducted in the second chapter reveals the essence of organizational learning, explains the significance of individual and collective learning for OL. Next, the researchers delve into the work done by clinicians as professionals in the context of OL. The steps taken allow substantiating the three levels of clinicians’ involvement in the OL processes – individual, group/department and organization‑as‑a‑whole. A thorough review of the theoretical background created the conditions for the empirical investigation into the organizational learning of clinicians. The research has been conducted in a small hospital in Lithuania. Highly selective sampling suggests that the data on the OL of the clinicians acquired during the research, and a detailed description of its relation to the context provides reliable insights into various aspects of the organizational learning of clinicians. The conclusions also raise questions that require further investigation, suggest health care administrators and clinicians consider collective efforts to create better quality organizational knowledge that would enable healthcare institutions to cope with continuously emerging ill‑structured problems.
临床医生组织学习的特点及其成因
在过去的几十年里,知识管理的概念已经从管理信息发展到让员工参与到知识工作中来——特别是在OL过程中。然而,研究文献描述了医院组织学习的各种障碍,这些障碍与组织活动的背景以及临床医生的专业自主权与规范临床医生工作的官僚要求之间的冲突有关。本文探讨了临床医生在个人和集体层面上发生的OL的特点,并检查了这些特点的原因。本文以引言开头,对研究问题进行了论证,提出了研究目的和概念立场,概述了研究的逻辑结构。第二章的文献综述揭示了组织学习的本质,说明了个人学习和集体学习对于组织学习的意义。接下来,研究人员深入研究了临床医生作为专业人员在OL背景下所做的工作。所采取的步骤可以证实临床医生参与OL过程的三个层面-个人,小组/部门和组织-作为一个整体。对理论背景的全面回顾为临床医生组织学习的实证研究创造了条件。这项研究是在立陶宛的一家小医院进行的。高度选择性的抽样表明,在研究期间获得的关于临床医生OL的数据,以及对其与背景关系的详细描述,为临床医生组织学习的各个方面提供了可靠的见解。结论也提出了需要进一步调查的问题,建议卫生保健管理人员和临床医生考虑共同努力,创造更高质量的组织知识,使卫生保健机构能够应对不断出现的结构不良问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management
Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信