Sedation Free Colonoscopy: Patients’ Characteristics and satisfaction in a hospital based Endoscopy Unit

Amit Kumar, R. Pathak
{"title":"Sedation Free Colonoscopy: Patients’ Characteristics and satisfaction in a hospital based Endoscopy Unit","authors":"Amit Kumar, R. Pathak","doi":"10.3126/JAIM.V4I2.16895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aims: Colonoscopy without sedation costs less and is more convenient than sedated colonoscopy and is the main mode of examination in our settings. The aims of the present study is to determine the percentage of patients who can successfully undergo unsedated colonoscopy and the factors contributing to patient satisfaction following the examination. Material and Methods: Demographic, clinical, and colonoscopy related data were prospectively evaluated in 113 patients undergoing unsedated colonoscopy by an experienced endoscopist during the period of October 2015 to January 2016 at a single hospital based endoscopy setup. All colonoscopies routinely began without sedation and was curtailed if the patient or physician desired. Age, sex, prior abdominal operation, pain during examination and the time required to complete the colonoscopy were recorded. The patients were asked to rate their pain on scale of 0 to 10, their satisfaction and willingness to undergo colonoscopy without sedation in future if required. Results: In a total of 113 patients (mean age of 54.01 years) undergoing sedation free colonoscopy, 108 (95.5%) required no sedation. Complete colonoscopy was done in 106 of the 108 and 110 of the 113 patients. The mean pain score was 2.58 in an average time taken of 11.9 minutes. Average time for intubation taken in post-operative patients (n=20) was 12.24 minutes. 96(84.9%) of the patients were completely or well satisfied with the examination and 7(6.2%) were not satisfied with the procedure. There was not much difference in pain perception or satisfaction based on gender. Conclusion: Colonoscopy without sedation can be completed successfully in a vast majority of patients with proper technique by experienced endoscopist. The practice saves time and money and patients are willing to return for future examinations if required. The facility of sedation should be present if required for any reason.","PeriodicalId":75443,"journal":{"name":"Advances in internal medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"45-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in internal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/JAIM.V4I2.16895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Colonoscopy without sedation costs less and is more convenient than sedated colonoscopy and is the main mode of examination in our settings. The aims of the present study is to determine the percentage of patients who can successfully undergo unsedated colonoscopy and the factors contributing to patient satisfaction following the examination. Material and Methods: Demographic, clinical, and colonoscopy related data were prospectively evaluated in 113 patients undergoing unsedated colonoscopy by an experienced endoscopist during the period of October 2015 to January 2016 at a single hospital based endoscopy setup. All colonoscopies routinely began without sedation and was curtailed if the patient or physician desired. Age, sex, prior abdominal operation, pain during examination and the time required to complete the colonoscopy were recorded. The patients were asked to rate their pain on scale of 0 to 10, their satisfaction and willingness to undergo colonoscopy without sedation in future if required. Results: In a total of 113 patients (mean age of 54.01 years) undergoing sedation free colonoscopy, 108 (95.5%) required no sedation. Complete colonoscopy was done in 106 of the 108 and 110 of the 113 patients. The mean pain score was 2.58 in an average time taken of 11.9 minutes. Average time for intubation taken in post-operative patients (n=20) was 12.24 minutes. 96(84.9%) of the patients were completely or well satisfied with the examination and 7(6.2%) were not satisfied with the procedure. There was not much difference in pain perception or satisfaction based on gender. Conclusion: Colonoscopy without sedation can be completed successfully in a vast majority of patients with proper technique by experienced endoscopist. The practice saves time and money and patients are willing to return for future examinations if required. The facility of sedation should be present if required for any reason.
无镇静结肠镜检查:医院内窥镜检查组患者的特点和满意度
背景和目的:无镇静结肠镜检查比镇静结肠镜检查成本更低,更方便,是我们设置的主要检查模式。本研究的目的是确定能够成功进行非镇静结肠镜检查的患者的百分比以及影响检查后患者满意度的因素。材料和方法:前瞻性评估2015年10月至2016年1月在一家医院内窥镜检查机构由经验丰富的内窥镜医师进行非镇静结肠镜检查的113例患者的人口统计学、临床和结肠镜检查相关数据。所有结肠镜检查都是在没有镇静的情况下开始的,如果病人或医生希望,可以减少。记录年龄、性别、既往腹部手术、检查时疼痛和完成结肠镜检查所需时间。患者被要求对他们的疼痛进行0到10的评分,如果需要,他们的满意度和愿意在未来不使用镇静剂的情况下进行结肠镜检查。结果:113例患者(平均年龄54.01岁)行无镇静结肠镜检查,其中108例(95.5%)无需镇静。108例患者中有106例完成了结肠镜检查,113例患者中有110例完成了结肠镜检查。平均疼痛评分为2.58分,平均时间为11.9分钟。20例术后患者平均插管时间为12.24分钟。96例(84.9%)患者对检查完全满意或满意,7例(6.2%)患者对手术不满意。在疼痛感知和满意度上,性别差异不大。结论:在经验丰富的内镜医师的指导下,无镇静结肠镜检查可以成功完成绝大多数患者的手术。这种做法节省了时间和金钱,如果需要,病人愿意回来接受未来的检查。如果出于任何原因需要,镇静设备应在场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书