The Living Tree: Kr̥ṣṇā Sobtī’s Pre-Partition Punjab and the “Other History”

Q2 Arts and Humanities
R. Vuille
{"title":"The Living Tree: Kr̥ṣṇā Sobtī’s Pre-Partition Punjab and the “Other History”","authors":"R. Vuille","doi":"10.12797/cis.23.2021.01.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historical fiction covers a wide range of texts and presents a large variety of views on the subject of history. It is often seen as a way of narrating history from a perspective ignored by academic historiography, thus offering an alternative narrative of the past. This other way of writing history, namely by way of literary texts, is not always conscious or openly acknowledged. In her essays on literature, the Hindi writer Kr̥ṣṇā Sobtī (1925–2019) clearly formulates her views on the role of the writer when she commits herself to represent the past, differentiating her role from that of a historian per se. Personally, as a writer, she is primarily interested in the perception of time of the people of a region and their understanding of their own past transmitted through tales, songs and other media; this constitutes what Sobtī calls the “other history”, a notion close to Jan Assmann’s “mnemohistory”. Through the example of Sobtī’s magnum opus, Zindagīnāmā, this paper explores what this specific way of narrating history reveals about the rural society of the pre-Partition Punjab.","PeriodicalId":36623,"journal":{"name":"Cracow Indological Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cracow Indological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12797/cis.23.2021.01.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Historical fiction covers a wide range of texts and presents a large variety of views on the subject of history. It is often seen as a way of narrating history from a perspective ignored by academic historiography, thus offering an alternative narrative of the past. This other way of writing history, namely by way of literary texts, is not always conscious or openly acknowledged. In her essays on literature, the Hindi writer Kr̥ṣṇā Sobtī (1925–2019) clearly formulates her views on the role of the writer when she commits herself to represent the past, differentiating her role from that of a historian per se. Personally, as a writer, she is primarily interested in the perception of time of the people of a region and their understanding of their own past transmitted through tales, songs and other media; this constitutes what Sobtī calls the “other history”, a notion close to Jan Assmann’s “mnemohistory”. Through the example of Sobtī’s magnum opus, Zindagīnāmā, this paper explores what this specific way of narrating history reveals about the rural society of the pre-Partition Punjab.
活树:Kr æ ṣṇā sobt ' s分治前的旁遮普与“他者历史”
历史小说涵盖了广泛的文本,呈现了对历史主题的各种各样的观点。它通常被视为一种从学术史学所忽视的角度叙述历史的方式,从而提供了对过去的另一种叙述。另一种书写历史的方式,即通过文学文本,并不总是被意识到或公开承认。在她的文学论文中,印度作家Kr ā ṣṇā sobt ā(1925-2019)明确阐述了她对作家在致力于代表过去时所扮演的角色的看法,将她的角色与历史学家本身区分开来。就个人而言,作为一名作家,她主要感兴趣的是一个地区人民对时间的感知,以及他们通过故事、歌曲和其他媒体传播的对自己过去的理解;这就构成了索伯特所说的“他者历史”,这个概念接近于扬·阿斯曼的“记忆历史”。本文以索毕的巨著《Zindagīnāmā》为例,探讨这种特殊的历史叙述方式所揭示的旁遮普分治前的乡村社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cracow Indological Studies
Cracow Indological Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信