Towards an inadequately rational bicameralism. The Italian Senate ‘reform’ (1948–1963)

IF 0.6 3区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

Journal of Modern Italian Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI:10.1080/1354571X.2022.2148398

Salvatore Mura

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT After the adoption of the Italian Constitution, why did the parties choose to reduce instead of emphasizing the differences between the two Chambers that formed the Parliament? This article highlights the importance of the debate held in Italy between 1948 and 1963 on the functions, composition and methods to elect the Senate. The result, the Constitutional Law 3, 1963, eliminated almost all the differences between the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies. This cannot, therefore, be considered a ‘small reform’, as it was defined, but one that profoundly conditioned the Italy’s subsequent political history and the evolution of Italian bicameralism.

查看原文本刊更多论文

走向不够理性的两院制。意大利参议院“改革”（1948–1963）

摘要意大利宪法通过后，各党派为什么选择减少而不是强调组成议会的两院之间的分歧？本文强调了1948年至1963年间在意大利举行的关于参议院职能、组成和选举方法的辩论的重要性。结果，1963年第3号宪法消除了参议院和众议院之间几乎所有的分歧。因此，这不能被视为其定义的“小改革”，而是深刻地制约了意大利随后的政治历史和意大利两院制的演变。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Modern Italian Studies Multiple-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Modern Italian Studies (JMIS) is the leading English language forum for debate and discussion on modern Italy. This peer-reviewed journal publishes five issues a year, each containing scholarly articles, book reviews and review essays relating to the political, economic, cultural, and social history of modern Italy from 1700 to the present. Many issues are thematically organized and the JMIS is especially committed to promoting the study of modern and contemporary Italy in international and comparative contexts. As well as specialists and researchers, the JMIS addresses teachers, educators and all those with an interest in contemporary Italy and its history.