Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulae

Aydın Yildiz, A. Comez
{"title":"Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulae","authors":"Aydın Yildiz, A. Comez","doi":"10.4172/2324-8599.1000231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To investigate the accuracy of seven currently-used intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulae. Patients and methods: A total of 429 eyes of 429 patients were retrospectively analyzed. A low-optical coherence reflectometry device (Lenstar, Haag-Streit) was used for the calculations. SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis, Holladay-2, Olsen, Hill-RBF and Barrett Universal II formulae were studied. The study included patients who underwent phacoemulsification surgery with a 2.8 mm corneal cut by a single surgeon. Refraction measurement was done at the first postoperative visit, and then spherical equivalent values were recorded for each patient. Mean absolute error (MAE) was calculated as the absolute value of postoperative spherical equivalent value minus predicted error for each formula. Results: The mean age of the patients was 67.51 ± 5.75 years. Mean axial length was 23.42 ± 2.02 mm (min: 20.03, max: 32.68, median: 23.09). Mean IOL power was 21.1 ± 5 diopters (min: -1.5, max: 3.5). Postoperative spherical values were between -1.50 and +1.00 diopters. Mean absolute errors were 0.317 for SRK/T, 0.280 for Holladay-2, 0.273 for Hoffer Q, 0.264 for Haigis, 0.347 for Barrett Universal II, 0.339 for Hill-RBF, and 0.351 for Olsen. Conclusion: Hoffer Q, Holladay-2, and Haigis formulae had significantly lower MAE values than SRK/T, Barrett Universal II, Hill-RBF, and Olsen formulae. Although the Haigis formula gave the lowest MAE value, there was no significant difference with the Hoffer Q and Holladay-2 formulae.","PeriodicalId":89944,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Ophthalmic Pathology","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Ophthalmic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2324-8599.1000231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the accuracy of seven currently-used intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulae. Patients and methods: A total of 429 eyes of 429 patients were retrospectively analyzed. A low-optical coherence reflectometry device (Lenstar, Haag-Streit) was used for the calculations. SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis, Holladay-2, Olsen, Hill-RBF and Barrett Universal II formulae were studied. The study included patients who underwent phacoemulsification surgery with a 2.8 mm corneal cut by a single surgeon. Refraction measurement was done at the first postoperative visit, and then spherical equivalent values were recorded for each patient. Mean absolute error (MAE) was calculated as the absolute value of postoperative spherical equivalent value minus predicted error for each formula. Results: The mean age of the patients was 67.51 ± 5.75 years. Mean axial length was 23.42 ± 2.02 mm (min: 20.03, max: 32.68, median: 23.09). Mean IOL power was 21.1 ± 5 diopters (min: -1.5, max: 3.5). Postoperative spherical values were between -1.50 and +1.00 diopters. Mean absolute errors were 0.317 for SRK/T, 0.280 for Holladay-2, 0.273 for Hoffer Q, 0.264 for Haigis, 0.347 for Barrett Universal II, 0.339 for Hill-RBF, and 0.351 for Olsen. Conclusion: Hoffer Q, Holladay-2, and Haigis formulae had significantly lower MAE values than SRK/T, Barrett Universal II, Hill-RBF, and Olsen formulae. Although the Haigis formula gave the lowest MAE value, there was no significant difference with the Hoffer Q and Holladay-2 formulae.
人工晶体度数计算公式的准确性
目的:探讨目前使用的七种人工晶状体度数计算公式的准确性。患者和方法:回顾性分析429例429眼患者的临床资料。使用低光学相干反射计设备(Lenstar,Haag Streit)进行计算。研究了SRK/T、Hoffer Q、Haigis、Holladay-2、Olsen、Hill RBF和Barrett Universal II公式。该研究包括由一名外科医生进行2.8毫米角膜切口的超声乳化手术的患者。在术后第一次就诊时进行屈光度测量,然后记录每位患者的球面等效值。平均绝对误差(MAE)计算为术后球面当量的绝对值减去每个公式的预测误差。结果:患者平均年龄为67.51±5.75岁。平均轴长为23.42±2.02mm(最小值:20.03,最大值:32.68,中值:23.09)。平均IOL屈光度为21.1±5屈光度(最小值为-1.5,最大值为3.5)。术后球形值在-1.50和+1.00屈光度之间。SRK/T的平均绝对误差为0.317,Holladay-2为0.280,Hoffer Q为0.273,Haigis为0.264,Barrett Universal II为0.347,Hill RBF为0.339,Olsen为0.351。结论:Hoffer Q、Holladay-2和Haigis公式的MAE值显著低于SRK/T、Barrett Universal II、Hill RBF和Olsen公式。尽管Haigis公式给出的MAE值最低,但与Hoffer Q和Holladay-2公式没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信