Engineering characteristics prioritisation in QFD using ordinal scales: a robustness analysis

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
M. Galetto, F. Franceschini, D. Maisano, L. Mastrogiacomo
{"title":"Engineering characteristics prioritisation in QFD using ordinal scales: a robustness analysis","authors":"M. Galetto, F. Franceschini, D. Maisano, L. Mastrogiacomo","doi":"10.1504/EJIE.2018.090617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quality function deployment (QFD) is a management tool used for the design of new products/services and the related production/supply processes. One of the goals of the method is to translate the customer requirements (CRs) into measurable engineering characteristics (ECs) of the new product/service and prioritise them, basing on their relationships with CRs and the related importances. To this purpose, the current scientific literature encompasses several alternative approaches (the most used is the independent scoring method – ISM), in most of which cardinal properties are arbitrarily attributed to data collected on ordinal scales. This paper describes and discusses a new approach based on ME-MCDM (multi expert/multiple criteria decision making) techniques, which do not require any debatable ordinal to cardinal conversion. The theoretical principles and the robustness of the method are presented and tested through some application examples related to a well-known case study reported in the scientific literature. [Received 5 May 2015; Revised 7 November 2017; Accepted 9 November 2017]","PeriodicalId":51047,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Industrial Engineering","volume":"12 1","pages":"151-174"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/EJIE.2018.090617","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIE.2018.090617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Quality function deployment (QFD) is a management tool used for the design of new products/services and the related production/supply processes. One of the goals of the method is to translate the customer requirements (CRs) into measurable engineering characteristics (ECs) of the new product/service and prioritise them, basing on their relationships with CRs and the related importances. To this purpose, the current scientific literature encompasses several alternative approaches (the most used is the independent scoring method – ISM), in most of which cardinal properties are arbitrarily attributed to data collected on ordinal scales. This paper describes and discusses a new approach based on ME-MCDM (multi expert/multiple criteria decision making) techniques, which do not require any debatable ordinal to cardinal conversion. The theoretical principles and the robustness of the method are presented and tested through some application examples related to a well-known case study reported in the scientific literature. [Received 5 May 2015; Revised 7 November 2017; Accepted 9 November 2017]
QFD中使用有序量表的工程特征优先级:稳健性分析
质量功能展开(QFD)是一种用于设计新产品/服务及相关生产/供应过程的管理工具。该方法的目标之一是将客户需求(CRs)转化为新产品/服务的可测量的工程特征(ECs),并根据它们与CRs的关系和相关重要性对它们进行优先级排序。为此目的,目前的科学文献包含了几种替代方法(最常用的是独立评分方法- ISM),其中大多数基本属性都任意归因于在序数尺度上收集的数据。本文描述并讨论了一种基于ME-MCDM(多专家/多准则决策)技术的新方法,该方法不需要任何有争议的序数到基数的转换。本文介绍了该方法的理论原理和鲁棒性,并通过与科学文献中报道的一个著名案例研究相关的一些应用实例进行了验证。[2015年5月5日收到;2017年11月7日修订;接受2017年11月9日]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Industrial Engineering
European Journal of Industrial Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: EJIE is an international journal aimed at disseminating the latest developments in all areas of industrial engineering, including information and service industries, ergonomics and safety, quality management as well as business and strategy, and at bridging the gap between theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信