A Framework for Evaluating the Effects of Reduced Spatial or Temporal Monitoring Effort

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Samuel M. Bashevkin
{"title":"A Framework for Evaluating the Effects of Reduced Spatial or Temporal Monitoring Effort","authors":"Samuel M. Bashevkin","doi":"10.15447/sfews.2022v20iss3art5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Monitoring in the San Francisco Estuary (estuary) has fluctuated in sampling effort over time with changes to resources, objectives, and unforeseen events. I designed an approach to evaluate how reduced sampling would alter our ability to describe the status and trends of key species. This approach can evaluate the sensitivity of the estuary monitoring program to disruptions in sampling, and whether sampling effort could be reduced without compromising the information provided by these surveys. I simulated reduced sampling on top of the historical data record (1985–2018) by selectively removing data and evaluating the effect on model inference. The same model structure is fit to the full data set and several reduced data sets that represent simulations of reduced sampling effort. I then compared model predictions from reduced models to those from the full model to evaluate how reduced sampling may have affected our ability to detect key patterns in the data. In a case study, I applied this approach to Sacramento Splittail abundance trends from the Bay Study and the Suisun Marsh Fish Study otter trawls. Sampling reductions of 10% and 20% had fairly low impacts on the overlap of reduced model predictions with those from the full model. These results demonstrate the utility of my approach, but they are not generalizable beyond our ability to detect trends in Splittail abundance from Bay Study and Suisun Marsh Fish Study otter trawl data. A thorough analysis should run these simulations on multiple species and multiple parameters (e.g., abundance, distribution, length). By simulating sampling reductions on top of historical conditions, this approach could evaluate differential effects in varying environmental or historical conditions (e.g., droughts, species declines, invasions). In addition, this approach can easily be extended to other functional groups (e.g., zooplankton, phytoplankton) as well as physical parameters (e.g., temperature, salinity, Secchi depth).","PeriodicalId":38364,"journal":{"name":"San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2022v20iss3art5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monitoring in the San Francisco Estuary (estuary) has fluctuated in sampling effort over time with changes to resources, objectives, and unforeseen events. I designed an approach to evaluate how reduced sampling would alter our ability to describe the status and trends of key species. This approach can evaluate the sensitivity of the estuary monitoring program to disruptions in sampling, and whether sampling effort could be reduced without compromising the information provided by these surveys. I simulated reduced sampling on top of the historical data record (1985–2018) by selectively removing data and evaluating the effect on model inference. The same model structure is fit to the full data set and several reduced data sets that represent simulations of reduced sampling effort. I then compared model predictions from reduced models to those from the full model to evaluate how reduced sampling may have affected our ability to detect key patterns in the data. In a case study, I applied this approach to Sacramento Splittail abundance trends from the Bay Study and the Suisun Marsh Fish Study otter trawls. Sampling reductions of 10% and 20% had fairly low impacts on the overlap of reduced model predictions with those from the full model. These results demonstrate the utility of my approach, but they are not generalizable beyond our ability to detect trends in Splittail abundance from Bay Study and Suisun Marsh Fish Study otter trawl data. A thorough analysis should run these simulations on multiple species and multiple parameters (e.g., abundance, distribution, length). By simulating sampling reductions on top of historical conditions, this approach could evaluate differential effects in varying environmental or historical conditions (e.g., droughts, species declines, invasions). In addition, this approach can easily be extended to other functional groups (e.g., zooplankton, phytoplankton) as well as physical parameters (e.g., temperature, salinity, Secchi depth).
一个评估减少空间或时间监测努力效果的框架
旧金山河口(河口)的监测随着时间的推移随着资源、目标和不可预见事件的变化而波动。我设计了一种方法来评估减少采样将如何改变我们描述关键物种现状和趋势的能力。该方法可以评估河口监测程序对采样中断的敏感性,以及是否可以在不影响这些调查提供的信息的情况下减少采样努力。我通过选择性地删除数据并评估对模型推理的影响,在历史数据记录(1985-2018)的基础上模拟了减少采样。相同的模型结构适合于完整的数据集和几个简化的数据集,这些数据集代表了减少采样努力的模拟。然后,我将简化模型的模型预测与完整模型的模型预测进行了比较,以评估减少的采样可能如何影响我们检测数据中关键模式的能力。在一个案例研究中,我将这种方法应用于萨克拉门托裂尾鱼的丰度趋势,这些趋势来自海湾研究和suissun沼泽鱼研究水獭拖网。10%和20%的采样减少对减少模型预测与完整模型预测重叠的影响相当低。这些结果证明了我的方法的实用性,但除了我们从海湾研究和水獭拖网数据中检测裂尾鱼丰度趋势的能力之外,它们并不能推广。一个彻底的分析应该在多个物种和多个参数(例如,丰度,分布,长度)上运行这些模拟。通过模拟历史条件下的采样减少,该方法可以评估不同环境或历史条件(如干旱、物种减少、入侵)的差异效应。此外,这种方法可以很容易地扩展到其他官能团(例如,浮游动物,浮游植物)以及物理参数(例如,温度,盐度,Secchi深度)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science
San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信