Comparing the Effects of Two Cream Formulations, Henna (Lawsonia inermis) and Clotrimazole, on Vaginal Candidiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 1.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Masumeh Yaralizadeh, P. Abedi, Salimeh Nezamivand Chegini, Maryam Yaralizadeh, Laila Hormozie, Z. Hejazi, S. Ghanbari
{"title":"Comparing the Effects of Two Cream Formulations, Henna (Lawsonia inermis) and Clotrimazole, on Vaginal Candidiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Masumeh Yaralizadeh, P. Abedi, Salimeh Nezamivand Chegini, Maryam Yaralizadeh, Laila Hormozie, Z. Hejazi, S. Ghanbari","doi":"10.5812/jjnpp.118510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Vaginal candidiasis is the most prevalent infection among reproductive-aged women. The current treatment for this disorder includes azole compounds. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two creams, henna (Lawsonia inermis) and clotrimazole, on vaginal candidiasis. Methods: In this trial, 80 women with vaginal candidiasis were recruited and randomly assigned into two groups to receive either henna (n = 40) or clotrimazole (n = 40) for one week. The ethanol extract of henna was prepared. Vaginal discharge was cultured, and vaginal pH, colony formation, lactobacillus formation, and vaginitis subjective symptoms were evaluated before and one, two, and four weeks after the intervention. The chi-square test, independent t-test, and Generalized Estimating Equations were were used for analyzing the data using SPSS version 22. Results: After four weeks of the intervention, almost 90% of the women in the henna group declared no burning sensation, itching, discharge, irritation, or dyspareunia, while only 45%, 5%, 37.5%, 52.5%, and 27.5% of the participants in the clotrimazole group did not have these symptoms, respectively (P < 0.001). The means (SD) of colony formation were 290.85 (47.35) and 265.12 (37.46) in the henna and clotrimazole groups, respectively, at the baseline, which reduced to zero and 25.45 (25.09) in the 4th week of the intervention (P = 0.001). Compared with the clotrimazole group, there was a significant increase in the mean of lactobacillus formation and a significant decrease in vaginal pH in the henna group (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Henna vaginal cream could significantly reduce the symptoms of vaginal candidiasis, such as burning sensation, itching, discharge, irritation, and dyspareunia. Also, it could decrease colony formation and vaginal pH and increase lactobacillus formation.","PeriodicalId":17745,"journal":{"name":"Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jjnpp.118510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vaginal candidiasis is the most prevalent infection among reproductive-aged women. The current treatment for this disorder includes azole compounds. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two creams, henna (Lawsonia inermis) and clotrimazole, on vaginal candidiasis. Methods: In this trial, 80 women with vaginal candidiasis were recruited and randomly assigned into two groups to receive either henna (n = 40) or clotrimazole (n = 40) for one week. The ethanol extract of henna was prepared. Vaginal discharge was cultured, and vaginal pH, colony formation, lactobacillus formation, and vaginitis subjective symptoms were evaluated before and one, two, and four weeks after the intervention. The chi-square test, independent t-test, and Generalized Estimating Equations were were used for analyzing the data using SPSS version 22. Results: After four weeks of the intervention, almost 90% of the women in the henna group declared no burning sensation, itching, discharge, irritation, or dyspareunia, while only 45%, 5%, 37.5%, 52.5%, and 27.5% of the participants in the clotrimazole group did not have these symptoms, respectively (P < 0.001). The means (SD) of colony formation were 290.85 (47.35) and 265.12 (37.46) in the henna and clotrimazole groups, respectively, at the baseline, which reduced to zero and 25.45 (25.09) in the 4th week of the intervention (P = 0.001). Compared with the clotrimazole group, there was a significant increase in the mean of lactobacillus formation and a significant decrease in vaginal pH in the henna group (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Henna vaginal cream could significantly reduce the symptoms of vaginal candidiasis, such as burning sensation, itching, discharge, irritation, and dyspareunia. Also, it could decrease colony formation and vaginal pH and increase lactobacillus formation.
比较两种乳膏配方,指甲花(Lawsonia inermis)和克霉唑治疗阴道念珠菌病的效果:一项随机对照试验
背景:阴道念珠菌病是育龄妇女中最常见的感染。目前治疗这种疾病的药物包括唑类化合物。目的:本研究的目的是比较两种乳膏,指甲花(Lawsonia inermis)和克霉唑治疗阴道念珠菌病的效果。方法:本试验招募80例阴道念珠菌病患者,随机分为两组,分别接受指甲花(n = 40)和克霉唑(n = 40)治疗一周。制备了指甲花乙醇提取物。阴道分泌物培养,阴道pH值、菌落形成、乳酸菌形成和阴道炎主观症状在干预前、干预后1、2和4周进行评估。数据分析采用卡方检验、独立t检验和广义估计方程,采用SPSS 22。结果:干预四周后,指甲花组中几乎90%的女性表示没有烧灼感、瘙痒、分泌物、刺激或性交困难,而克霉唑组中分别只有45%、5%、37.5%、52.5%和27.5%的参与者没有这些症状(P < 0.001)。指甲花组和克霉唑组菌落形成的平均值(SD)在基线时分别为290.85(47.35)和265.12(37.46),在干预第4周时分别降至0和25.45 (25.09)(P = 0.001)。与克霉唑组相比,指甲花组乳酸菌生成平均值显著升高,阴道pH值显著降低(P < 0.001)。结论:指甲花阴道乳膏可显著减轻阴道念珠菌病的烧灼感、瘙痒、分泌物、刺激、性交困难等症状。此外,它还能减少菌落的形成和阴道pH值,增加乳酸菌的形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信