{"title":"Pindar, Pythian 6.50–51","authors":"N. Lane","doi":"10.5406/illiclasstud.45.2.0476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recent editors have printed Bowra’s conjecture to resolve the textual crux at Pindar, Pythian 6.50. This note identifies problems with that approach, reviews the MS evidence, and proposes a new solution.","PeriodicalId":81501,"journal":{"name":"Illinois classical studies","volume":"45 1","pages":"476 - 481"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Illinois classical studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/illiclasstud.45.2.0476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent editors have printed Bowra’s conjecture to resolve the textual crux at Pindar, Pythian 6.50. This note identifies problems with that approach, reviews the MS evidence, and proposes a new solution.