BPost and Nordzucker: Searching for the Essence of Ne Bis in Idem in European Union Law

IF 1.6 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel
{"title":"BPost and Nordzucker: Searching for the Essence of Ne Bis in Idem in European Union Law","authors":"Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel","doi":"10.1017/S1574019622000190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union entitles a person not to be tried twice for the same criminal offence within the EU (ne bis in idem).1 Despite its apparent simplicity, the personal and territorial scope of ne bis in idem as well as the exceptions to it continue to raise interpretation problems. That is all the more the case in the increasingly transnational enforcement context the EU continues to develop.2 The 22 March 2022 BPost","PeriodicalId":45815,"journal":{"name":"European Constitutional Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Constitutional Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019622000190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union entitles a person not to be tried twice for the same criminal offence within the EU (ne bis in idem).1 Despite its apparent simplicity, the personal and territorial scope of ne bis in idem as well as the exceptions to it continue to raise interpretation problems. That is all the more the case in the increasingly transnational enforcement context the EU continues to develop.2 The 22 March 2022 BPost
BPost与Nordzucker:探寻欧盟法律中的奈比原则本质
《欧洲联盟基本权利宪章》第50条规定,一个人在欧盟内不得因同一刑事罪行而受到两次审判尽管显然很简单,但从个人和地域的角度来看,既属事罪的范围及其例外情况继续引起解释问题。在欧盟继续发展的日益跨国的执法背景下,情况更是如此2022年3月22日英国邮政
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), a peer reviewed English language journal, is a platform for advancing the study of European constitutional law, its history and evolution. Its scope is European law and constitutional law, history and theory, comparative law and jurisprudence. Published triannually, it contains articles on doctrine, scholarship and history, plus jurisprudence and book reviews. However, the premier issue includes more than twenty short articles by leading experts, each addressing a single topic in the Draft Constitutional Treaty for Europe. EuConst is addressed at academics, professionals, politicians and others involved or interested in the European constitutional process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信