Analyzing complexities in the Brazilian soybean supply chain: a systems thinking and modeling approach

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS
Monique Filassi, Andrea Leda Ramos de Oliveira, A. Elias, Karina Braga Marsola
{"title":"Analyzing complexities in the Brazilian soybean supply chain: a systems thinking and modeling approach","authors":"Monique Filassi, Andrea Leda Ramos de Oliveira, A. Elias, Karina Braga Marsola","doi":"10.1108/rausp-03-2021-0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to analyze the complexities of the Brazilian soybean supply chain (SSC) and develop strategic interventions to improve the origin system’s performance.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study used stakeholder interviews to identify the SSC bottlenecks and determine and assess drivers of competitiveness. A methodological framework based on the systems thinking approach for developing long-term structural changes was used. The problem was structured using behavior over time graph and causal loop modeling to propose three investment strategies to solve the logistics problem in SSC.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study highlights the gaps in coordination between stakeholders and the public sector regarding the public policy for infrastructure investment. Three strategic interventions were developed to address the agro-industrial logistical problem, namely, investment in storage, multimodal transport systems and improvements in existing transport infrastructure. To overcome transport and storage logistics limitations, the authors suggest different forms of partnerships, including public-private partnerships.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis research is limited to evaluating an agricultural commodity (soybean) and does not include its by-products. The sample of stakeholders was limited and the boundary of analysis was Brazil. Nevertheless, the study showed how strategic interventions could be developed following a holistic analysis.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe proposed integrated approach illustrates the development of three strategic initiatives. It can be implemented by stakeholders, including the public sector, which is the basis for providing assertive long-term investments in Brazilian logistics.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe SSC analysis could promote the implementation of systemically determined interventions and strategies. It could significantly improve the performance of agricultural systems and help the formulation of public policies aimed at rural development.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe use of system dynamics to identify intervention points is an essential contribution to mitigating the SSC’s hindrances. Moreover, the combining methodologies resulted in comprehensive intervention strategies.\n","PeriodicalId":43400,"journal":{"name":"RAUSP Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAUSP Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rausp-03-2021-0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to analyze the complexities of the Brazilian soybean supply chain (SSC) and develop strategic interventions to improve the origin system’s performance. Design/methodology/approach This study used stakeholder interviews to identify the SSC bottlenecks and determine and assess drivers of competitiveness. A methodological framework based on the systems thinking approach for developing long-term structural changes was used. The problem was structured using behavior over time graph and causal loop modeling to propose three investment strategies to solve the logistics problem in SSC. Findings This study highlights the gaps in coordination between stakeholders and the public sector regarding the public policy for infrastructure investment. Three strategic interventions were developed to address the agro-industrial logistical problem, namely, investment in storage, multimodal transport systems and improvements in existing transport infrastructure. To overcome transport and storage logistics limitations, the authors suggest different forms of partnerships, including public-private partnerships. Research limitations/implications This research is limited to evaluating an agricultural commodity (soybean) and does not include its by-products. The sample of stakeholders was limited and the boundary of analysis was Brazil. Nevertheless, the study showed how strategic interventions could be developed following a holistic analysis. Practical implications The proposed integrated approach illustrates the development of three strategic initiatives. It can be implemented by stakeholders, including the public sector, which is the basis for providing assertive long-term investments in Brazilian logistics. Social implications The SSC analysis could promote the implementation of systemically determined interventions and strategies. It could significantly improve the performance of agricultural systems and help the formulation of public policies aimed at rural development. Originality/value The use of system dynamics to identify intervention points is an essential contribution to mitigating the SSC’s hindrances. Moreover, the combining methodologies resulted in comprehensive intervention strategies.
分析巴西大豆供应链的复杂性:系统思维和建模方法
本研究旨在分析巴西大豆供应链(SSC)的复杂性,并制定战略干预措施以改善原产地系统的绩效。本研究使用利益相关者访谈来确定SSC瓶颈,并确定和评估竞争力的驱动因素。采用了一种基于系统思维方法的方法框架,用于发展长期结构变化。利用行为随时间图和因果循环模型对问题进行结构化,提出了解决SSC物流问题的三种投资策略。本研究突出了利益相关者与公共部门在基础设施投资公共政策方面的协调差距。为解决农工物流问题,制定了三项战略干预措施,即投资于储存、多式联运系统和改善现有运输基础设施。为了克服运输和仓储物流的限制,作者建议建立不同形式的伙伴关系,包括公私伙伴关系。研究局限性/意义本研究仅限于评估一种农产品(大豆),不包括其副产品。利益相关者的样本是有限的,分析的边界是巴西。然而,该研究显示了如何在全面分析之后制定战略干预措施。实际意义建议的综合方法说明了三项战略举措的发展。它可以由包括公共部门在内的利益相关者实施,这是为巴西物流提供自信的长期投资的基础。社会意义SSC分析可以促进系统确定的干预措施和战略的实施。它可以大大改善农业系统的绩效,并有助于制定旨在农村发展的公共政策。独创性/价值使用系统动力学来确定干预点是减轻SSC障碍的重要贡献。此外,综合方法产生了综合干预策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信