A role for MCDA to navigate the trade-offs in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence’s public health recommendations

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Brian P. Reddy , Stephen J. Walters , Alejandra Duenas , Praveen Thokala , Michael P. Kelly
{"title":"A role for MCDA to navigate the trade-offs in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence’s public health recommendations","authors":"Brian P. Reddy ,&nbsp;Stephen J. Walters ,&nbsp;Alejandra Duenas ,&nbsp;Praveen Thokala ,&nbsp;Michael P. Kelly","doi":"10.1016/j.orhc.2019.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Recommendations made by the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) consider a range of relevant factors. Most famously, this includes interventions’ incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). Given the ICER’s primacy in such decision-making, it is sometimes assumed as almost analogous to an optimisation problem, maximising the number of Quality Adjusted Life Years generated by the </span>health system subject to costs. However, structured OR techniques could still prove beneficial in informing the broader decision-making problem. Decisions are currently arrived at by advisory committees through a combination of structured processes and relatively unstructured deliberations. In principle, decision makers are expected to consider dozens of relevant factors after the completion of the economic modelling stage. No model is currently used to combine these, and MCDA may be suitable to better structure and aid these discussions and to highlight the opportunity costs associated with them. This paper outlines some of the factors currently considered in </span>public health<span> settings, proposes a number of approaches as to how MCDA-inspired techniques could be grafted onto current NICE processes incrementally, and considers the appropriateness of their use in this setting given NICE’s role in the health system. The paper focuses on the formulation of NICE’s public health guidance, as this area has a specific focus on equity and the determinants of health, and is therefore has the most obvious need to balance ICERs and other factors.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":46320,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research for Health Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.orhc.2019.02.001","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research for Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211692317301674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Recommendations made by the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) consider a range of relevant factors. Most famously, this includes interventions’ incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). Given the ICER’s primacy in such decision-making, it is sometimes assumed as almost analogous to an optimisation problem, maximising the number of Quality Adjusted Life Years generated by the health system subject to costs. However, structured OR techniques could still prove beneficial in informing the broader decision-making problem. Decisions are currently arrived at by advisory committees through a combination of structured processes and relatively unstructured deliberations. In principle, decision makers are expected to consider dozens of relevant factors after the completion of the economic modelling stage. No model is currently used to combine these, and MCDA may be suitable to better structure and aid these discussions and to highlight the opportunity costs associated with them. This paper outlines some of the factors currently considered in public health settings, proposes a number of approaches as to how MCDA-inspired techniques could be grafted onto current NICE processes incrementally, and considers the appropriateness of their use in this setting given NICE’s role in the health system. The paper focuses on the formulation of NICE’s public health guidance, as this area has a specific focus on equity and the determinants of health, and is therefore has the most obvious need to balance ICERs and other factors.

MCDA在国家健康和护理卓越研究所的公共卫生建议中发挥的作用
英国国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)提出的建议考虑了一系列相关因素。最著名的是,这包括干预措施的增量成本效益比(ICER)。鉴于ICER在此类决策中的首要地位,它有时被认为几乎类似于优化问题,即在成本约束下最大化卫生系统产生的质量调整生命年的数量。然而,结构化OR技术仍然可以证明在通知更广泛的决策问题方面是有益的。目前,咨询委员会通过结构化程序和相对非结构化的审议相结合的方式作出决定。原则上,在完成经济建模阶段后,决策者应该考虑几十个相关因素。目前还没有模型用于将这些结合起来,MCDA可能适合于更好地组织和帮助这些讨论,并突出与之相关的机会成本。本文概述了目前在公共卫生环境中考虑的一些因素,提出了一些方法,如何将mcda启发的技术逐步嫁接到目前的NICE过程中,并考虑到NICE在卫生系统中的作用,在这种环境中使用它们的适当性。本文的重点是制定NICE的公共卫生指南,因为这一领域特别关注公平和健康的决定因素,因此最明显需要平衡ICERs和其他因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Operations Research for Health Care
Operations Research for Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信