MET Inhibitors for Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma

IF 1.1 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Kidney Cancer Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI:10.3233/kca-230005
J. Brundage, Kamalakanta Sahu, B. Maughan
{"title":"MET Inhibitors for Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma","authors":"J. Brundage, Kamalakanta Sahu, B. Maughan","doi":"10.3233/kca-230005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) has a relatively poor prognosis in the metastatic setting. In contrast to clear cell kidney cancer, there are limited treatment options specifically tested in PRCC. Alterations in the MET pathway are common in PRCC and may play a pivotal role in promoting tumor growth and the development of resistance to systemic therapy. OBJECTIVE: Current data on the efficacy of MET inhibitors over standard of care in PRCC is immature and evolving. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess and summarize the results and limitations of landmark trials of MET inhibitors for PRCC as well as to discuss barriers faced by trials of these drugs. METHODS: Manuscripts and abstracts were collected from PubMed, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) historical abstracts and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) historical abstracts. Included studies must have been either a clinical trial, systematic review or narrative review and included PRCC patients. Patients must have been treated with a selective or non-selective MET inhibitor. After the final application of criteria, 30 studies were included. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Cabozantinib has the best evidence for use showing improved outcomes in PRCC. Other MET inhibitors, including savolitinib, crizotinib, and foretinib have shown possible benefit in patients with MET-positive disease, but the inconsistent definition of MET status and a low patient accrual rate prevented further extrapolation of the individual trial results. Future trials of single agent savolitinib, as well as combination MET inhibitor/ immuno-oncology (IO) therapies, have the potential to change the therapeutic landscape of using MET inhibitors for PRCC.","PeriodicalId":17823,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/kca-230005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) has a relatively poor prognosis in the metastatic setting. In contrast to clear cell kidney cancer, there are limited treatment options specifically tested in PRCC. Alterations in the MET pathway are common in PRCC and may play a pivotal role in promoting tumor growth and the development of resistance to systemic therapy. OBJECTIVE: Current data on the efficacy of MET inhibitors over standard of care in PRCC is immature and evolving. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess and summarize the results and limitations of landmark trials of MET inhibitors for PRCC as well as to discuss barriers faced by trials of these drugs. METHODS: Manuscripts and abstracts were collected from PubMed, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) historical abstracts and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) historical abstracts. Included studies must have been either a clinical trial, systematic review or narrative review and included PRCC patients. Patients must have been treated with a selective or non-selective MET inhibitor. After the final application of criteria, 30 studies were included. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Cabozantinib has the best evidence for use showing improved outcomes in PRCC. Other MET inhibitors, including savolitinib, crizotinib, and foretinib have shown possible benefit in patients with MET-positive disease, but the inconsistent definition of MET status and a low patient accrual rate prevented further extrapolation of the individual trial results. Future trials of single agent savolitinib, as well as combination MET inhibitor/ immuno-oncology (IO) therapies, have the potential to change the therapeutic landscape of using MET inhibitors for PRCC.
MET抑制剂治疗乳头状肾细胞癌
背景:乳头状肾细胞癌(PRCC)在转移环境中预后相对较差。与透明细胞肾脏癌症相反,在PRCC中专门测试的治疗选择有限。MET途径的改变在PRCC中很常见,可能在促进肿瘤生长和系统治疗耐药性的发展中发挥关键作用。目的:目前关于MET抑制剂在PRCC中的疗效超过标准护理的数据尚不成熟且不断发展。本系统综述的目的是评估和总结MET抑制剂用于PRCC的里程碑式试验的结果和局限性,并讨论这些药物试验面临的障碍。方法:手稿和摘要收集自PubMed、美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)历史摘要和欧洲医学肿瘤学会(ESMO)历史文摘。纳入的研究必须是临床试验、系统综述或叙述性综述,并纳入PRCC患者。患者必须使用选择性或非选择性MET抑制剂进行治疗。在最终应用标准后,纳入了30项研究。结果/结论:卡博扎替尼有最好的证据表明其在PRCC中的疗效有所改善。其他MET抑制剂,包括沙维替尼、克唑替尼和福瑞替尼,在MET阳性疾病患者中显示出可能的益处,但MET状态的定义不一致和患者累积率低,阻止了个体试验结果的进一步推断。未来的单剂沙维替尼以及MET抑制剂/免疫肿瘤学(IO)联合疗法的试验有可能改变使用MET抑制剂治疗PRCC的治疗前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney Cancer
Kidney Cancer Multiple-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信