Home is where the health is: New Zealand responses to a “healthy” housing crisis

IF 0.8 Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Rochelle Ade, Michael Rehm
{"title":"Home is where the health is: New Zealand responses to a “healthy” housing crisis","authors":"Rochelle Ade, Michael Rehm","doi":"10.1080/14445921.2020.1808278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT It is accepted in both popular culture and the academic literature that ‘cold and damp’ housing leads to poor health outcomes for occupants. Many solutions have been proposed to remedy this from voluntary healthy home checklists, green building ratings tools to mandatory government legislation. This study reviews the responses comparing the different mechanisms and drawing conclusions about the potential effectiveness of each. While each approach has admirable aims flaws are identified with the design and application. These include a static assessment methodology (one off inspection), a reliance on simplified checklists and prescriptive interventions and a focus on cold and damp with no counterbalancing consideration of overheating in a climate of recognised global warming. The Healthy Home Standards are identified as the most flawed approach containing multiple exemptions that can be exploited to avoid compliance. Homestar is recognised as the most comprehensive and detailed mechanism currently available to provide healthy housing in NZ.","PeriodicalId":44302,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Rim Property Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14445921.2020.1808278","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Rim Property Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14445921.2020.1808278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT It is accepted in both popular culture and the academic literature that ‘cold and damp’ housing leads to poor health outcomes for occupants. Many solutions have been proposed to remedy this from voluntary healthy home checklists, green building ratings tools to mandatory government legislation. This study reviews the responses comparing the different mechanisms and drawing conclusions about the potential effectiveness of each. While each approach has admirable aims flaws are identified with the design and application. These include a static assessment methodology (one off inspection), a reliance on simplified checklists and prescriptive interventions and a focus on cold and damp with no counterbalancing consideration of overheating in a climate of recognised global warming. The Healthy Home Standards are identified as the most flawed approach containing multiple exemptions that can be exploited to avoid compliance. Homestar is recognised as the most comprehensive and detailed mechanism currently available to provide healthy housing in NZ.
健康的地方就是家:新西兰对"健康的"住房危机的反应
摘要流行文化和学术文献都认为,“寒冷潮湿”的住房会导致居住者的健康状况不佳。已经提出了许多解决方案来弥补这一问题,从自愿的健康家庭清单、绿色建筑评级工具到强制性的政府立法。本研究回顾了比较不同机制的反应,并得出了每种机制潜在有效性的结论。虽然每种方法都有令人钦佩的目标,但在设计和应用中都会发现缺陷。其中包括静态评估方法(一次性检查),依赖简化的检查表和规定性干预措施,关注寒冷和潮湿,而不平衡地考虑公认的全球变暖气候下的过热。《健康家庭标准》被认为是最有缺陷的方法,包含多种豁免,可以用来避免遵守。Homestar被公认为新西兰目前提供健康住房的最全面、最详细的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信