Rally Effect in the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Role of Affectedness, Fear, and Partisanship

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Melanie Dietz, Sigrid Rossteutscher, Philipp Scherer, Lars-Christopher Stövsand
{"title":"Rally Effect in the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Role of Affectedness, Fear, and Partisanship","authors":"Melanie Dietz, Sigrid Rossteutscher, Philipp Scherer, Lars-Christopher Stövsand","doi":"10.1080/09644008.2021.2016707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When the Covid-19 pandemic hit internationally in March 2020, governments and political incumbents received exceptionally high approval ratings. Such a sudden spike of public support in times of crisis is often explained as the ‘ rally ‘ round the fl ag ’ e ff ect. This paper has three goals: fi rst, to examine whether a rally e ff ect indeed occurred; second, to analyse whether and how much it is related to (i) a ff ectedness, i.e. the occurrence of infections on individual and aggregate level, and (ii) fear of Covid-19; and third, to examine an assumed moderating e ff ect of partisanship. We merged individual survey data from an online survey conducted in September 2020 as part of the German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES) with infection rates on the state level (Bundesländer) published by the Robert Koch Institute. We detect a striking rally e ff ect in all partisan camps. Furthermore, we identify fear of Covid-19 as the driving mechanism while there is no evidence that a ff ectedness is a major force behind the rally e ff ect. Furthermore, we show that partisanship takes on a moderating role for fear of Covid-19 regarding satisfaction with government.","PeriodicalId":46640,"journal":{"name":"German Politics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2021.2016707","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

When the Covid-19 pandemic hit internationally in March 2020, governments and political incumbents received exceptionally high approval ratings. Such a sudden spike of public support in times of crisis is often explained as the ‘ rally ‘ round the fl ag ’ e ff ect. This paper has three goals: fi rst, to examine whether a rally e ff ect indeed occurred; second, to analyse whether and how much it is related to (i) a ff ectedness, i.e. the occurrence of infections on individual and aggregate level, and (ii) fear of Covid-19; and third, to examine an assumed moderating e ff ect of partisanship. We merged individual survey data from an online survey conducted in September 2020 as part of the German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES) with infection rates on the state level (Bundesländer) published by the Robert Koch Institute. We detect a striking rally e ff ect in all partisan camps. Furthermore, we identify fear of Covid-19 as the driving mechanism while there is no evidence that a ff ectedness is a major force behind the rally e ff ect. Furthermore, we show that partisanship takes on a moderating role for fear of Covid-19 regarding satisfaction with government.
新冠肺炎大流行中的集会效应:意外、恐惧和党派偏见的作用
2020年3月,当新冠肺炎疫情在国际上肆虐时,各国政府和现任政治人物获得了极高的支持率。在危机时期,公众支持率的突然飙升通常被解释为围绕影响的“集会”。本文有三个目标:第一,检验是否确实发生了反弹效应;第二,分析它是否以及在多大程度上与以下因素有关:(i)意外,即个体和总体感染的发生,以及(ii)对新冠肺炎的恐惧;第三,考察一种假定的党派之争的缓和效应。作为德国纵向选举研究(GLES)的一部分,我们将2020年9月进行的一项在线调查的个人调查数据与罗伯特·科赫研究所发布的州一级(联邦)的感染率合并。我们在所有党派阵营中都发现了一种引人注目的集会效果。此外,我们认为对新冠肺炎的恐惧是驱动机制,但没有证据表明意外是反弹效应背后的主要力量。此外,我们表明,由于担心新冠肺炎对政府的满意度,党派之争起到了调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
German Politics
German Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信