Book review: Family Memory: Practices, Transmissions and Uses in a Global Perspective

IF 1.4 2区心理学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES

Memory Studies Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1177/17506980231176043b

Ashley Barnwell

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Dos Santos CS, McCarroll CJ and Sant’Anna A (2023) The relation between memory and imagination: a debate about the right concepts. In: Sant’Anna A, McCarroll CJ and Michaelian K (eds) Current Controversies in Philosophy of Memory. New York: Routledge, pp. 38–58. McCarroll C (2018) Remembering from the Outside: Personal Memory and the Perspectival Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. McCarroll C (2020) Remembering the personal past: beyond the boundaries of imagination. Frontiers in Psychology 11: 585352. Michaelian K and Sutton J (2019) Collective mental time travel: remembering the past and imagining the future together. Synthese 196: 4933–4960. Perrin D (2016) Asymmetries in subjective time. In: Michaelian K, Klein SB and Szpunar KK (eds) Seeing the Future: Theoretical Perspectives on Future-Oriented Mental Time Travel. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 39–61. Robins SK (2020) Defending discontinuism, naturally. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 11(2): 469–486. Sant’Anna A (2021) Attitudes and the (dis)continuity between memory and imagination. Estudios de Filosofía 64: 73–93.

查看原文本刊更多论文

书评：《家庭记忆：全球视野下的实践、传播和使用》

Dos Santos CS，McCarroll CJ和Sant’Anna A（2023）记忆和想象之间的关系：关于正确概念的辩论。在：Sant‘Anna A，McCarroll CJ和Michaelian K（编辑）记忆哲学中的当前争议。纽约：劳特利奇，第38-58页。麦卡罗C（2018）《从外部回忆：个人记忆与透视思维》。牛津：牛津大学出版社。麦卡罗C（2020）回忆个人过去：超越想象的边界。心理学前沿11:585532。Michaelian K和Sutton J（2019）集体心理时间旅行：一起回忆过去和想象未来。合成196:4933–4960。Perrin D（2016）主观时间的不对称性。在：Michaelian K，Klein SB和Szpunar KK（编辑）看到未来：面向未来的心理时间旅行的理论视角。纽约：牛津大学出版社，第39-61页。Robins SK（2020）自然地为中止主义辩护。哲学与心理学评论11（2）：469–486。Sant’Anna A（2021）态度和记忆与想象之间的连续性。费洛索夫学院64：73–93。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Memory Studies Multiple-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

18.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Memory Studies is an international peer reviewed journal. Memory Studies affords recognition, form, and direction to work in this nascent field, and provides a critical forum for dialogue and debate on the theoretical, empirical, and methodological issues central to a collaborative understanding of memory today. Memory Studies examines the social, cultural, cognitive, political and technological shifts affecting how, what and why individuals, groups and societies remember, and forget. The journal responds to and seeks to shape public and academic discourse on the nature, manipulation, and contestation of memory in the contemporary era.