Disruptive human resource management technologies: a systematic literature review

IF 4.2 Q2 BUSINESS
K. G. Priyashantha, A. C. De Alwis, I. Welmilla
{"title":"Disruptive human resource management technologies: a systematic literature review","authors":"K. G. Priyashantha, A. C. De Alwis, I. Welmilla","doi":"10.1108/ejmbe-01-2022-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe disruptive human resource management (HRM) technologies are now considered a significant facilitator to change and benefit the entire HRM landscape. This view needs to be further verified by reviewing the knowledge on the subject in the empirical research landscape. Thus, the study's objectives were to find (1) the current knowledge and (2) the areas where empirical research is lacking in disruptive HRM technologies.Design/methodology/approachThe article is a literature review that was followed by the systematic literature review and the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). The review considered 45 articles published during the 2008–2021 period extracted from the Scopus database, and bibliometric analysis was performed to achieve the research objectives.FindingsThe results found that scholarly attention has been given to electronic HRM (E-HRM) rather than the disruptive HRM technologies. The areas investigated include the determinants of intention, adoptions and use of E-HRM and the outcomes of E-HRM adoptions and use. These outcomes can be further divided into general outcomes and HRM outcomes.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings reveal gaps in E-HRM research and disruptive HRM technologies remain untapped in the empirical research landscape. Hence, the study findings provide some implications for future research and applications.Originality/valueThe study found empirically proven determinants of E-HRM intention, adoptions and use and E-HRM adoptions and use outcomes. These were found in the studies conducted during the 2008–2021 period.","PeriodicalId":45118,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Management and Business Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Management and Business Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejmbe-01-2022-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

PurposeThe disruptive human resource management (HRM) technologies are now considered a significant facilitator to change and benefit the entire HRM landscape. This view needs to be further verified by reviewing the knowledge on the subject in the empirical research landscape. Thus, the study's objectives were to find (1) the current knowledge and (2) the areas where empirical research is lacking in disruptive HRM technologies.Design/methodology/approachThe article is a literature review that was followed by the systematic literature review and the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). The review considered 45 articles published during the 2008–2021 period extracted from the Scopus database, and bibliometric analysis was performed to achieve the research objectives.FindingsThe results found that scholarly attention has been given to electronic HRM (E-HRM) rather than the disruptive HRM technologies. The areas investigated include the determinants of intention, adoptions and use of E-HRM and the outcomes of E-HRM adoptions and use. These outcomes can be further divided into general outcomes and HRM outcomes.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings reveal gaps in E-HRM research and disruptive HRM technologies remain untapped in the empirical research landscape. Hence, the study findings provide some implications for future research and applications.Originality/valueThe study found empirically proven determinants of E-HRM intention, adoptions and use and E-HRM adoptions and use outcomes. These were found in the studies conducted during the 2008–2021 period.
颠覆性人力资源管理技术:系统文献综述
目的颠覆性人力资源管理(HRM)技术现在被认为是改变和造福整个人力资源管理格局的重要推动者。这一观点需要通过回顾实证研究领域中关于该主题的知识来进一步验证。因此,该研究的目标是找到(1)当前的知识和(2)在颠覆性人力资源管理技术方面缺乏实证研究的领域。设计/方法论/方法这篇文章是一篇文献综述,随后是系统文献综述和系统综述和荟萃分析(PRISMA)的首选报告项目。该综述考虑了从Scopus数据库中提取的2008-2011年期间发表的45篇文章,并进行了文献计量分析以实现研究目标。研究结果发现,学术界关注的是电子人力资源管理,而不是颠覆性的人力资源管理技术。调查的领域包括电子人力资源管理的意图、采用和使用的决定因素,以及采用和使用电子人力资源的结果。这些结果可以进一步分为一般结果和人力资源管理结果。研究局限性/含义研究结果揭示了电子人力资源管理研究的差距,而颠覆性人力资源管理技术在实证研究领域仍未得到开发。因此,研究结果为未来的研究和应用提供了一些启示。独创性/价值研究发现了经验证明的E-HRM意图、采用和使用以及E-HRM采用和使用结果的决定因素。这些都是在2008-2011年期间进行的研究中发现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Management and Business Economics is interested in the publication and diffusion of articles of rigorous theoretical, methodological or empirical research associated with the areas of business economics, including strategy, finance, management, marketing, organisation, human resources, operations, and corporate governance, and tourism. The journal aims to attract original knowledge based on academic rigour and of relevance for academics, researchers, professionals, and/or public decision-makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信