Supreme Court confirms suspects’ privacy rights: the judgment clarified, two criticisms answered

Q2 Social Sciences

Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/17577632.2022.2139568

G. Phillipson

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This Note clarifies the core finding of the Supreme Court, explains why it does not pose the threat to press freedom some media commentary has alleged, and addresses two issues arising from the complex relationship between confidentiality and privacy.

查看原文本刊更多论文

最高法院确认嫌疑人隐私权：判决澄清，两项批评得到回应

摘要本说明阐明了最高法院的核心裁决，解释了为什么最高法院没有对一些媒体评论所称的新闻自由构成威胁，并解决了保密和隐私之间复杂关系引发的两个问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Media Law Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The only platform for focused, rigorous analysis of global developments in media law, this peer-reviewed journal, launched in Summer 2009, is: essential for teaching and research, essential for practice, essential for policy-making. It turns the spotlight on all those aspects of law which impinge on and shape modern media practices - from regulation and ownership, to libel law and constitutional aspects of broadcasting such as free speech and privacy, obscenity laws, copyright, piracy, and other aspects of IT law. The result is the first journal to take a serious view of law through the lens. The first issues feature articles on a wide range of topics such as: Developments in Defamation · Balancing Freedom of Expression and Privacy in the European Court of Human Rights · The Future of Public Television · Cameras in the Courtroom - Media Access to Classified Documents · Advertising Revenue v Editorial Independence · Gordon Ramsay: Obscenity Regulation Pioneer?