Decolonizing Evaluation: Truth, Power, and the Global Evaluation Knowledge Base

Hur Hassnain
{"title":"Decolonizing Evaluation: Truth, Power, and the Global Evaluation Knowledge Base","authors":"Hur Hassnain","doi":"10.56645/jmde.v19i44.803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluations play a critical role in shaping the way international development interventions are designed and managed. This contributes to the fact that there are intrinsic power dynamics at play during the production of evaluation knowledge. In the wake of growing commitments to deal with the repercussions of a colonial past and a prolonged history of white supremacy, there has been growing recognition of the need to decolonize evaluation theory and practice to help foster equality and ensure that evaluation knowledge is generated, shared, and understood universally. Increased efforts are being made to understand the risks involved if evaluations fail to utilize decolonized evaluation methods and approaches. We are faced with questions such as: How can we decolonize evaluation and disrupt unequal power relations? How can the evaluation process itself be transformative and an opportunity for co-liberation? What practical tools and steps facilitate power sharing? How can evaluation be used to advance decolonization and social justice? \nThis paper describes the connection between truth and power and how that relates to the evaluation and decolonization debates. It provides potential starting points for decolonizing evaluation practice, including some examples where this has already been tested. To conclude it focuses on the universalisation of evaluation knowledge and the need to ensure that evaluation knowledge is translated and disseminated via inclusive forms of communication to ensure that learning can be better understood and hence translated into action orientated practice from grassroot to government level.   \nThe aim of this paper is to advance the discussion on decolonizing evaluation practice and provide some potential ways forward in terms of transforming evaluation theory and practice. \nKeywords \nDecolonizing evaluation, development, results, learning, accountability","PeriodicalId":91909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v19i44.803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluations play a critical role in shaping the way international development interventions are designed and managed. This contributes to the fact that there are intrinsic power dynamics at play during the production of evaluation knowledge. In the wake of growing commitments to deal with the repercussions of a colonial past and a prolonged history of white supremacy, there has been growing recognition of the need to decolonize evaluation theory and practice to help foster equality and ensure that evaluation knowledge is generated, shared, and understood universally. Increased efforts are being made to understand the risks involved if evaluations fail to utilize decolonized evaluation methods and approaches. We are faced with questions such as: How can we decolonize evaluation and disrupt unequal power relations? How can the evaluation process itself be transformative and an opportunity for co-liberation? What practical tools and steps facilitate power sharing? How can evaluation be used to advance decolonization and social justice? This paper describes the connection between truth and power and how that relates to the evaluation and decolonization debates. It provides potential starting points for decolonizing evaluation practice, including some examples where this has already been tested. To conclude it focuses on the universalisation of evaluation knowledge and the need to ensure that evaluation knowledge is translated and disseminated via inclusive forms of communication to ensure that learning can be better understood and hence translated into action orientated practice from grassroot to government level.   The aim of this paper is to advance the discussion on decolonizing evaluation practice and provide some potential ways forward in terms of transforming evaluation theory and practice. Keywords Decolonizing evaluation, development, results, learning, accountability
非殖民化评价:真理、权力与全球评价知识库
评价在制定和管理国际发展干预措施方面发挥着关键作用。这促成了这样一个事实,即在评估知识的产生过程中,存在内在的权力动态。随着人们越来越多地承诺应对殖民历史和白人至上主义长期历史的影响,人们越来越认识到有必要将评估理论和实践非殖民化,以帮助促进平等,并确保评估知识的产生、共享和普遍理解。如果评价未能利用非殖民化的评价方法和方法,正在加大努力了解所涉及的风险。我们面临着这样的问题:我们如何才能使评估非殖民化,破坏不平等的权力关系?评估过程本身如何具有变革性,如何成为共同解放的机会?哪些实用工具和步骤有助于权力共享?如何利用评价促进非殖民化和社会正义?本文描述了真相与权力之间的联系,以及这与评估和非殖民化辩论之间的关系。它为非殖民化评价做法提供了潜在的起点,包括一些已经测试过的例子。总之,它侧重于评估知识的普及,以及确保评估知识通过包容性的沟通形式进行翻译和传播的必要性,以确保学习能够得到更好的理解,从而转化为从基层到政府层面的行动导向的实践。本文的目的是推进评估实践非殖民化的讨论,并为评估理论和实践的转变提供一些潜在的途径。非殖民化评价、发展、成果、学习、问责制
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信